Indirect representation of grammatical class at the lexeme level

Behavioral and Brain Sciences 22 (1):49-50 (1999)
Lexemes supposedly represent phonological but not grammatical information. Phonological word substitutions pose problems for this account because the target and error almost always come from the same grammatical class. This grammatical congruency effect can be explained within the Levelt et al. lexicon given that (1) lexemes are organized according to phonological similarity and (2) lexemes from the same grammatical category share phonological properties.
Keywords No keywords specified (fix it)
Categories (categorize this paper)
DOI 10.1017/S0140525X99341777
 Save to my reading list
Follow the author(s)
My bibliography
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Revision history
Request removal from index
Download options
Our Archive

Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy     Papers currently archived: 29,174
Through your library
References found in this work BETA

No references found.

Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

No citations found.

Add more citations

Similar books and articles
Grammatical Propositions.Barbara Schmitz - 2005 - Grazer Philosophische Studien 71 (1):227-249.
Intact Grammars but Intermittent Access.Susan Edwards & David Lightfoot - 2000 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 23 (1):31-32.
Wittgenstein and Expressivism.Dr David Macarthur - 2010 - In Daniel Whiting (ed.), The Later Wittgenstein on Language. Palgrave-Macmillan.
Wittgenstein on Grammar, Theses and Dogmatism.Peter M. S. Hacker - 2012 - Philosophical Investigations 35 (1):1-17.
Conflicting Grammatical Appearances.Guy Longworth - 2007 - Croatian Journal of Philosophy 21 (3):403-426.
Added to PP index

Total downloads
12 ( #382,515 of 2,180,068 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
6 ( #42,309 of 2,180,068 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Monthly downloads
My notes
Sign in to use this feature

There  are no threads in this forum
Nothing in this forum yet.

Other forums