Indirect representation of grammatical class at the lexeme level

Behavioral and Brain Sciences 22 (1):49-50 (1999)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

Lexemes supposedly represent phonological but not grammatical information. Phonological word substitutions pose problems for this account because the target and error almost always come from the same grammatical class. This grammatical congruency effect can be explained within the Levelt et al. lexicon given that (1) lexemes are organized according to phonological similarity and (2) lexemes from the same grammatical category share phonological properties.

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 90,593

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Conflicting Grammatical Appearances.Guy Longworth - 2007 - Croatian Journal of Philosophy 21 (3):403-426.
Wittgenstein on Grammar, Theses and Dogmatism.Peter M. S. Hacker - 2011 - Philosophical Investigations 35 (1):1-17.
Wittgenstein and expressivism.David Macarthur - 2009 - In Daniel Whiting (ed.), The Later Wittgenstein on Language. Palgrave-Macmillan.
Intact grammars but intermittent access.Susan Edwards & David Lightfoot - 2000 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 23 (1):31-32.
Grammatical propositions.Barbara Schmitz - 2006 - Grazer Philosophische Studien 71 (1):227-249.

Analytics

Added to PP
2009-01-28

Downloads
26 (#524,350)

6 months
14 (#114,812)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references