Dialectica 64 (2):225-236 (2010)
There is a solution to the antinomy of the variable that does not call for semantic relationism. I argue that if we carefully distinguish between variable types and variable tokens or occurrences, and if we take the number of variable types involved properly into account, then coordination among variable tokens or occurrences is reducible to an intrinsic semantic feature of those tokens or occurrences. The fact that two tokens or occurrences of the same variable type contained in the same sentence or context assume the same value at a time derives from an intrinsic semantic feature of a token or occurrence, namely from being a token or occurrence of a type whose tokens or occurrences must assume the same value at a time if contained in the same sentence or context.
|Keywords||No keywords specified (fix it)|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
References found in this work BETA
Citations of this work BETA
No citations found.
Similar books and articles
The K-Variable Property is Stronger Than H-Dimension K.Ian Hodkinson & András Simon - 1997 - Journal of Philosophical Logic 26 (1):81-101.
Variables in Natural Language: Where Do They Come From?'.Jaroslav Peregrin - 2000 - In Michael Böttner & Wolf Thümmel (eds.), Variable-Free Semantics. Secolo. pp. 46--65.
Correction to FOIL Axiomatized Studia Logica , 84:1–22, 2006.Melvin Fitting - 2007 - Studia Logica 85 (2):275 -.
From Contexts to Circumstances of Evaluation: Is the Trade-Off Always Innocuous?Mikhail Kissine - 2012 - Synthese 184 (2):199-216.
Added to index2010-07-02
Total downloads38 ( #134,777 of 2,163,984 )
Recent downloads (6 months)2 ( #188,660 of 2,163,984 )
How can I increase my downloads?