Phronesis 51 (4):330-361 (2006)

Authors
Sean Kelsey
University of Notre Dame
Abstract
Aristotle's thesis in Physics I 8 is that a certain old and familiar problem about coming to be can only be solved with the help of the new account of the "principles" he has developed in Physics I 7. This is a strong thesis and the literature on the chapter does not quite do it justice; specifically, as things now stand we are left wondering why Aristotle should have found this problem so compelling in the first place. In this paper I develop an interpretation which will help to remedy this.I believe that Aristotle's problem about coming to be depends on a certain principle to the effect that "nothing can become what it already is" . The main innovation of the interpretation developed here is its suggestion that we understand this principle as a principle about kinds. So understood, the principle does not make the comparatively trivial point that nothing can become any individual it already is, but rather the more powerful and substantive point that nothing can become any kind of thing it already is. I argue that this is a point which Aristotle himself accepts and that this is why the problem about coming to be raises serious difficulties for him. I also discuss Aristotle's proposed solutions to this problem, explaining how each draws on his new account of the principles and why each is required for any full resolution of the difficulties the problem raises. In this way I hope to show how the interpretation developed here does justice to the very strong thesis with which Aristotle begins Physics I 8. I conclude brie fly and somewhat speculatively with a suggestion as to why Aristotle might accept the principle on which I have suggested the problem turns
Keywords No keywords specified (fix it)
Categories (categorize this paper)
DOI 10.1163/156852806778876574
Options
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Request removal from index
Revision history

Download options

Our Archive


Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy     Papers currently archived: 49,987
External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
Through your library

References found in this work BETA

Substance and Predication in Aristotle.Frank A. LEWIS - 1991 - Cambridge University Press.
Aristotle’s Two Systems.Daniel W. Graham - 1987 - Oxford University Press.
Aristotle's Physics.R. S. - 1936 - Journal of Philosophy 33 (9):246-247.

View all 15 references / Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

Add more citations

Similar books and articles

Review of Christopher Shields, Aristotle[REVIEW]Barbara Sattler - 2008 - Notre Dame Philosophical Reviews 2008 (7).
Physics 199a8-12.Sean Kelsey - 2011 - Apeiron 44 (1):1-12.
Hylomorphism in Aristotle’s Physics.Sean Kelsey - 2010 - Ancient Philosophy 30 (1):107-24.
Understanding Physics Today.W. H. WATSON - 1963 - Cambridge: University P..
Modern Physics and Problems of Knowledge.Paul M. Clark (ed.) - 1981 - Open University Press.

Analytics

Added to PP index
2013-12-01

Total views
7 ( #959,463 of 2,324,062 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
2 ( #468,536 of 2,324,062 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads

My notes