Phronesis 51 (4):330-361 (2006)
AbstractAristotle's thesis in Physics I 8 is that a certain old and familiar problem about coming to be can only be solved with the help of the new account of the "principles" he has developed in Physics I 7. This is a strong thesis and the literature on the chapter does not quite do it justice; specifically, as things now stand we are left wondering why Aristotle should have found this problem so compelling in the first place. In this paper I develop an interpretation which will help to remedy this.I believe that Aristotle's problem about coming to be depends on a certain principle to the effect that "nothing can become what it already is" . The main innovation of the interpretation developed here is its suggestion that we understand this principle as a principle about kinds. So understood, the principle does not make the comparatively trivial point that nothing can become any individual it already is, but rather the more powerful and substantive point that nothing can become any kind of thing it already is. I argue that this is a point which Aristotle himself accepts and that this is why the problem about coming to be raises serious difficulties for him. I also discuss Aristotle's proposed solutions to this problem, explaining how each draws on his new account of the principles and why each is required for any full resolution of the difficulties the problem raises. In this way I hope to show how the interpretation developed here does justice to the very strong thesis with which Aristotle begins Physics I 8. I conclude brie fly and somewhat speculatively with a suggestion as to why Aristotle might accept the principle on which I have suggested the problem turns
Similar books and articles
Review of Christopher Shields, Aristotle. [REVIEW]Barbara Sattler - 2008 - Notre Dame Philosophical Reviews 2008 (7).
Is physics at the threshold of a new stage of evolution?R. Rompe & H. -J. Treder - 1983 - Foundations of Physics 13 (3):347-361.
Superposition & Interaction: Coherence in Physics.Richard Schlegel - 1980 - University of Chicago Press.
Notes on the philosophical status of nuclear physics.Giovanni Boniolo, Carlo Petrovich & Gualtiero Pisent - 2002 - Foundations of Science 7 (4):425-452.
Fearful Symmetry: The Search for Beauty in Modern Physics.A. Zee - 1986 - Princeton University Press.
Proceedings of the 4th Iligan National Physics Conference and 2nd Samahang Pisika Ng Visayas at Mindanao (Spvm) Physics Workshop, Msu-Iligan Institute of Technology, Iligan City, October 23-25, 2000. [REVIEW]Angelina Bacala & Arnold C. Alguno (eds.) - 2000 - Msu-Iligan Institute of Technology.
From Atoms to Galaxies: A Conceptual Physics Approach to Scientific Awareness.Sadri Hassani - 2010 - Taylor & Francis.
The Physics of Theism: God, Physics, and the Philosophy of Science.Jeffrey Koperski - 2015 - Hoboken, New Jersey: Wiley-Blackwell.
Added to PP
Historical graph of downloads
Citations of this work
Aristotle’s solution for Parmenides’ inconclusive argument in Physics I.3.Lucas Angioni - 2021 - Peitho 12 (1):41-67.
The Problem of Substantial Generation in Aristotle's Physical Writings.Michael Ivins - 2008 - Dissertation, Duquesne University
Privation and the principles of natural substance in Aristotle's Physics I.Sirio Trentini - 2018 - Dissertation, Ludwig Maximilians Universität, München