Glamorous self knowledge – what's it good for?
We have self-knowledge of various sorts: knowledge of things we have done or suffered, for example, and some knowledge of who we are: of our character-traits, our temper, our inclinations, weaknesses, feelings, addictions, worries, lusts and so on. Most of this knowledge is human knowledge of the regular kind, nothing exciting about it, epistemologically speaking.
|Keywords||No keywords specified (fix it)|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
References found in this work BETA
No references found.
Citations of this work BETA
No citations found.
Similar books and articles
Good Knowledge, Bad Knowledge: On Two Dogmas of Epistemology.Stephen Hetherington - 2001 - Oxford University Press.
The Distinction Between Knowledge-That and Knowledge-How.Huiming Ren - 2012 - Philosophia 40 (4):857-875.
The Nature of Ability and the Purpose of Knowledge.John Greco - 2007 - Philosophical Issues 17 (1):57–69.
Phenomenal Epistemology: What is Consciousness That We May Know It so Well?Terry Horgan & Uriah Kriegel - 2007 - Philosophical Issues 17 (1):123-144.
Knowledge, Wine, and Taste: What Good is Knowledge (in Enjoying Wine).Kent Bach - 2007 - In Barry C. Smith (ed.), Questions of Taste: The Philosophy of Wine. Oxford University Press. pp. 21--40.
Expressivism About Knowledge and the Value of Knowledge.Klemens Kappel - 2010 - Acta Analytica 25 (2):175-194.
Added to index2010-04-10
Total downloads86 ( #61,386 of 2,178,221 )
Recent downloads (6 months)1 ( #316,504 of 2,178,221 )
How can I increase my downloads?