Authors
Catherine Elizabeth Kendig
Michigan State University
Abstract
Philosophy of biology, perhaps more than any other philosophy of science, is a discipline in flux. What counts as consensus and key arguments in certain areas changes rapidly.The publication of Contemporary Debates in Philosophy of Biology (2010 Wiley-Blackwell) is reviewed and is used as a catalyst to a discussion of the recent expansion of subjects and perspectives in the philosophy of biology as well as their diverse epistemological and methodological commitments.
Keywords biology
Categories (categorize this paper)
DOI 10.1080/02698595.2011.552419
Options
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Request removal from index
Revision history

Download options

Our Archive
External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
Through your library

References found in this work BETA

Philosophy of Biology.Elliott Sober - 2000 - Westview Press.
Philosophy of Biology.Sergio Sismondo - 1995 - Philosophical Review 104 (1):164.

View all 21 references / Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

No citations found.

Add more citations

Similar books and articles

Again, What the Philosophy of Biology is Not.Werner Callebaut - 2005 - Acta Biotheoretica 53 (2):93-122.
Philosophy of Biology.Ingo Brigandt - 2011 - In Steven French & Juha Saatsi (eds.), The Bloomsbury Companion to the Philosophy of Science. London: Bloomsbury Academic. pp. 246-267.

Analytics

Added to PP index
2011-03-24

Total views
177 ( #48,105 of 2,326,057 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
4 ( #214,458 of 2,326,057 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads

My notes