Journal of Indian Philosophy 47 (3):565-601 (2019)

Vasubandhu’s Twenty Stanzas is among the most influential anti-Realist philosophical treatises in the history of Indian Buddhism. In particular, his refutation of the theories about the accumulation of atoms in stanza 12 if often regarded as compelling or even conclusive. But if this is the case, then the transition from stanza 12 to 13 would seem very odd, because in stanza 13 Vasubandhu bothers himself with yet another version of atomic accumulation. In this paper, I give an interpretation of stanzas 12–13 by drawing clues from the Abhidharmakośabhāṣya and Dharmapāla’s Dasheng guangbailun shilun. I argue that Vasubandhu’s refutation in stanza 12 is valid only if we assume that the only possible way atoms can accumulate is by means of physical contacts with neighboring atoms. Conversely, if the opponents do not accept this assumption, then Vasubandhu’s refutation would miss its target. Given that stanza 13 cites the theory of the Kāśmīravaibhāṣikas and seeks to refute it, we must interpret that the Kāśmīravaibhāṣikas hold that atoms can form an accumulation in which atoms do not come into physical contact with each other, because this would be the only way to deal with the challenge previously posed in stanza 12. Dharmapāla provides more details about this theory and seeks to refute it again. Assuming the same Vasubandhu to be the author of Abhidharmakośabhāṣya, in which the author deals with the same issue, we must judge that Vasubandhu himself is quite aware of the limitations of his refutation in stanza 12, and this explains why he feels the need to devote stanza 13 to further refuting the theory of the Kāśmīravaibhāṣikas. However, I also argue that Vasubandhu’s refutation of this theory fails. If my argument holds, then we must conclude that the refutation of the accumulation of atoms in the Twenty Stanzas may not be successful. This explains, at least in part, why Dignāga feels the need to find new arguments in his Ālambanaparīkṣā.
Keywords No keywords specified (fix it)
Categories (categorize this paper)
DOI 10.1007/s10781-019-09399-w
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Request removal from index
Revision history

Download options

PhilArchive copy

Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy     Papers currently archived: 62,496
External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
Through your library

References found in this work BETA

Dharmakīrti.Vincent Eltschinger - 2010 - Revue Internationale de Philosophie 253 (3):397-440.
On the Measure "Parimandala".B. David Burke - 1983 - Philosophy East and West 33 (3):273.

Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

No citations found.

Add more citations

Similar books and articles

External-World Skepticism in Classical India: The Case of Vasubandhu.Ethan Mills - 2017 - International Journal for the Study of Skepticism 7 (3):147-172.
Śubhagupta on the Cognitive Process.Margherita Serena Saccone - 2014 - Journal of Indian Philosophy 42 (2-3):377-399.
Dharmakīrti’s Criticism of Anityatva in the Sāṅkhya Theory.Toshikazu Watanabe - 2011 - Journal of Indian Philosophy 39 (4-5):553-569.
The Ionicvs a Minore of Horace.1.J. P. Postgate - 1924 - Classical Quarterly 18 (1):46-48.
Vasubandhu’s ”Refutation of the Theory of Selfhood’.James Duerlinger - 1989 - Journal of Indian Philosophy 17 (2):129-135.


Added to PP index

Total views
7 ( #1,035,034 of 2,446,356 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
1 ( #456,608 of 2,446,356 )

How can I increase my downloads?


My notes