Are the descendants of slaves owed compensation for slavery?

Journal of Applied Philosophy 16 (1):95–101 (1999)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

The compensatory‐justice justification of affirmative action requires a comparison of the actual world in which the injured person lives with a relevantly similar possible world in which this person lives but where the unjust injuring act never occurred, in order to identify the degree of harm brought about by the unjust injurious act. The problem is that some unjust injuring acts, particularly acts of slavery, led to intercourse and the later creation of the ancestors of many members of minority groups. Hence, there is no possible world in which these individuals exist and in which the injustice, e.g., slavery, did not occur. As a result, the counterfactual test does not allow us to measure or even understand the existence of a compensatable injury to these persons. I provide an inheritance‐based account of compensation that escapes this.

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 91,139

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Analytics

Added to PP
2009-01-28

Downloads
151 (#119,475)

6 months
34 (#95,472)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Stephen Kershnar
Fredonia State University

Citations of this work

Black reparations.Bernard Boxill - 2022 - Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy 1.
A Lockean argument for Black reparations.Bernard R. Boxill - 2003 - The Journal of Ethics 7 (1):63-91.
Transgenerational Compensation.George Sher - 2005 - Philosophy and Public Affairs 33 (2):181-200.
The counterfactual conception of compensation.Rodney C. Roberts - 2006 - Metaphilosophy 37 (3-4):414–428.

View all 6 citations / Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references