Authors
Stephen Kershnar
Fredonia State University
Abstract
In this article, I argue that with regard to the President, the Emoluments Clause is not law. I argue for this on the basis of two premises. First, if something is a law, then it has a legal remedy. Second, EC does not have a legal remedy. This premise rests on one or more of the following assumptions: EC does not apply to the President; if EC were to apply to the President, it does not provide a remedy; or, if EC were to apply to the President and have a remedy, it is not law because it is vague. The conclusion that EC does not apply to the President has a practical upshot. As a practical matter, President Trump’s worldwide business tentacles and his refusal to put his business assets into a blind trust does not violate EC and, arguably, does not violate federal conflict-of-interest law.
Keywords Emoluments Clause  Constitution  President  Donald Trump  Legal Reasoning  Nature of Law  Impeachment
Categories (categorize this paper)
ISBN(s) 0739-098X
DOI 10.5840/ijap201771081
Options
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Request removal from index
Revision history

Download options

PhilArchive copy


Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy     Papers currently archived: 58,823
External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
Through your library

References found in this work BETA

No references found.

Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

No citations found.

Add more citations

Similar books and articles

The Law is a Fractal: The Attempt to Anticipate Everything.Andrew Stumpff Morrison - 2013 - Loyola University Chicago Law Journal 44:649-681.
A Priori Knowledge That I Exist.Nick Zangwill - 2013 - Analytic Philosophy 54 (2):189-208.
Rule-Following in Philosophical Investigations.David Pears - 1989 - Grazer Philosophische Studien 33 (1):249-261.
Rule-Following in Philosophical Investigations.David Pears - 1989 - Grazer Philosophische Studien 33 (1):249-261.
Two Conceptions of Procedural Fairness.Cass Sunstein - 2006 - Social Research 73:619-646.
At Last! Aye, and There's the Rub.Alexander M. Capron - 2017 - American Journal of Bioethics 17 (7):4-7.
Hybrid Answer Set Programming.Alex Brik & Jeffrey Remmel - 2014 - Annals of Pure and Applied Logic 165 (1):134-163.
Rule Consequentialism and Moral Relativism in Advance.Ryan Jenkins - forthcoming - Journal of Philosophical Research.
Two Conceptions of Procedural Fairness.Cass R. Sunstein - 2006 - Social Research: An International Quarterly 73 (2):619-646.

Analytics

Added to PP index
2017-07-12

Total views
21 ( #499,612 of 2,425,901 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
2 ( #349,733 of 2,425,901 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads

My notes