One wrong does not justify another: Accepting dual processes by fallacy of false alternatives

Behavioral and Brain Sciences 30 (3):269-270 (2007)

Authors
Iris van Rooij
Radboud University Nijmegen
Abstract
Barbey & Sloman (B&S) advocate a dual-process (two-system) approach by comparing it with an alternative perspective (ecological rationality), claiming that the latter is unwarranted. Rejecting this alternative approach cannot serve as sufficient evidence for the viability of the former
Keywords No keywords specified (fix it)
Categories (categorize this paper)
DOI 10.1017/S0140525X07001781
Options
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Request removal from index
Revision history

Download options

Our Archive


Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy     Papers currently archived: 47,443
Through your library

References found in this work BETA

The Empirical Case for Two Systems of Reasoning.Steven A. Sloman - 1996 - Psychological Bulletin 119 (1):3-22.

View all 6 references / Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

No citations found.

Add more citations

Similar books and articles

Analytics

Added to PP index
2009-01-28

Total views
20 ( #471,057 of 2,292,014 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
1 ( #823,434 of 2,292,014 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads

My notes

Sign in to use this feature