Law and Philosophy 26 (5):437-463 (2007)

Authors
Stephen Kershnar
Fredonia State University
Abstract
In two recent cases, Grutter v. Bollinger, 539 U.S. 306. and Gratz v. Bollinger, 539 U.S. 244., the Supreme Court held that the Equal Protection Clause permitted state schools to use race-sensitive admissions in order to obtain the educational benefits that flow from a diverse student body. The diversity-based argument for race-sensitive admissions, scholarships, awards, and other opportunities at universities should have been rejected because it does not consider the full range of costs and benefits and because the more narrow educational effects probably weigh against such programs. However, this does not suggest that applicants' race, ethnicity, and gender should be ignored. Rather the same consideration that led to the defeat of the diversity argument, i.e., reasoning capacity, supports the consideration of demographic factors. However, attention to such factors further undermines the consequentialist case for affirmative action
Keywords Affirmative Action   Race  Admission  University  Discrimination  Supreme Court  Preferential Treatment  Reparations  Slavery  Diversity
Categories (categorize this paper)
DOI 10.1007/s10982-006-9007-x
Options
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Request removal from index
Revision history

Download options

PhilArchive copy


Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy     Papers currently archived: 63,295
Through your library

References found in this work BETA

No references found.

Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

No citations found.

Add more citations

Similar books and articles

Analytics

Added to PP index
2009-01-28

Total views
67 ( #159,511 of 2,448,746 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
5 ( #142,635 of 2,448,746 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads

My notes