Rights and consent in mixed martial arts

Journal of the Philosophy of Sport 47 (1):105-120 (2019)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

MMA fighting in a competition is not necessarily wrong and is often, as far as we can tell, permissible. Our argument has two premises. First, if an act does not infringe on anyone’s moral right or violate another side-constraint, then it is morally permissible. Second, MMA-violence does not infringe on anyone’s moral right or violate another side-constraint. The first premise rested on two assumptions. First, if a person does a wrong act, then he wrongs someone. Second, if one person wrongs a second, then the first infringes on the second’s right. We then looked at Nicholas Dixon’s powerful Kantian argument that MMA fighting is wrong.

Similar books and articles

Daoism and Chinese Martial Arts.Barry Allen - 2014 - Dao: A Journal of Comparative Philosophy 13 (2):251-266.
The Martial Arts and Buddhist Philosophy.Graham Priest - 2013 - Royal Institute of Philosophy Supplement 73:17-28.
The Martial Arts, Culture, and the Body.Eric Mullis - 2016 - Journal of Aesthetic Education 50 (4):114-124.
Is Proprioceptive Art Possible?Markus Schrenk - 2014 - In Graham George Priest & Damon Young (eds.), Philosophy and the Martial Arts. New York: Routledge. pp. 101-116.
Martial Categories: Clarification and Classification.Irena Martínková & Jim Parry - 2016 - Journal of the Philosophy of Sport 43 (1):143-162.
Martial Artist's Way.Glen Doyle - 1999 - Tuttle Publishing.
Martial Somaesthetics.Eric C. Mullis - 2013 - Journal of Aesthetic Education 47 (3):96-115.
Embodying martial arts for mental health: Cultivating psychological wellbeing with martial arts practice.Adam M. Croom - 2014 - Archives of Budo Science of Martial Arts and Extreme Sports 10:59-70.

Analytics

Added to PP
2019-08-17

Downloads
386 (#40,183)

6 months
114 (#16,556)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author Profiles

Robert M. Kelly
Bakersfield College
Stephen Kershnar
Fredonia State University

Citations of this work

Ethics of Mixed Martial Arts.Walter Veit & Heather Browning - forthcoming - In J. Holt & M. Ramsay (eds.), The Philosophy of Mixed Martial Arts: Squaring the Octagon. London: Routledge. pp. 134-149.
The moral responsibilities of fandom.George Tyler - 2021 - Journal of the Philosophy of Sport 48 (1):111-128.

Add more citations

References found in this work

Anarchy, State, and Utopia.Robert Nozick - 1974 - New York: Basic Books.
Anarchy, State, and Utopia.Robert Nozick - 1974 - Philosophy 52 (199):102-105.
The limits of morality.Shelly Kagan - 1989 - New York: Oxford University Press.
Exploitation.Alan Wertheimer - 1996 - Princeton University Press.

View all 19 references / Add more references