Science and Engineering Ethics 18 (1):91-102 (2012)
This paper analyses the nature of the relationship between risk and responsibility. Since neither the concept of risk nor the concept of responsibility has an unequivocal definition, it is obvious that there is no single interpretation of their relationship. After introducing the different meanings of responsibility used in this paper, we analyse four conceptions of risk. This allows us to make their link with responsibility explicit and to determine if a shift in the connection between risk and responsibility can be outlined. (1) In the engineer’s paradigm, the quantitative conception of risk does not include any concept of responsibility. Their relationship is indirect, the locus of responsibility being risk management. (2) In Mary Douglas’ cultural theory, risks are constructed through the responsibilities they engage. (3) Rayner and (4) Wolff go further by integrating forms of responsibility in the definition of risk itself. Analysis of these four frameworks shows that the concepts of risk and responsibility are increasingly intertwined. This tendency is reinforced by increasing public awareness and a call for the integration of a moral dimension in risk management. Therefore, we suggest that a form of virtue-responsibility should also be integrated in the concept of risk.
|Keywords||Risk Responsibility Models of risk Cultural theory Virtue|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
References found in this work BETA
Philosophical Perspectives on Risk.Sven Ove Hansson - 2004 - Techné: Research in Philosophy and Technology 8 (1):10-35.
Risk, Fear, Blame, Shame and the Regulation of Public Safety.Jonathan Wolff - 2006 - Economics and Philosophy 22 (3):409-427.
Bhopal: An Essay on Moral Responsibility and Civic Virtue.John Ladd - 1991 - Journal of Social Philosophy 22 (1):73-91.
Cultural Theory and Risk Analysis.Steve Rayner - 1992 - In S. Krimsky & D. Golding (eds.), Social Theories of Risk. Praeger. pp. 83--115.
Citations of this work BETA
Editors' Overview: Moral Responsibility in Technology and Engineering.Neelke Doorn & Ibo van de Poel - 2012 - Science and Engineering Ethics 18 (1):1-11.
Material Scarcity: A Reason for Responsibility in Technology Development and Product Design. [REVIEW]Andreas R. Köhler - 2013 - Science and Engineering Ethics 19 (3):1165-1179.
Similar books and articles
A Virtue Ethical Account of Making Decisions About Risk.N. Athanassoulis & A. Ross - 2010 - Journal of Risk Research 13 (2):217.
Varieties of Risk Representations.John Kadvany - 1997 - Journal of Social Philosophy 28 (3):123-143.
Does Community and Environmental Responsibility Affect Firm Risk? Evidence From UK Panel Data 1994–2006.A. Salama, K. Anderson & J. S. Toms - 2011 - Business Ethics 20 (2):192-204.
Luck, Risk, and Blame.Stale Fredriksen - 2005 - Journal of Medicine and Philosophy 30 (5):535 – 553.
Responsibility and Obligation: Some Kantian Directions.Suzanne M. Uniacke - 2005 - International Journal of Philosophical Studies 13 (4):461 – 475.
Groups, Responsibility, and Risk Taking in Business Organizations.Gregory Mellema - 1988 - Journal of Business Ethics 7 (8):593 - 603.
Risk Management Principles for Nanotechnology.E. Marchant Gary, J. Sylvester Douglas & W. Abbott Kenneth - 2008 - NanoEthics 2 (1):43-60.
Risk Vulnerability: A Graphical Interpretation.Louis Eeckhoudt & Béatrice Rey - 2011 - Theory and Decision 71 (2):227-234.
Causation and Responsibility: An Essay in Law, Morals, and Metaphysics.Michael S. Moore - 2009 - Oxford University Press.
The Risk Concept in Medicine — Statistical and Epidemiological Aspects: A Case Report for Applied Mathematics in Cardiology.Thomas Kenner & Karl P. Pfeiffer - 1986 - Theoretical Medicine and Bioethics 7 (3).
Added to index2010-11-22
Total downloads32 ( #157,100 of 2,154,174 )
Recent downloads (6 months)1 ( #397,226 of 2,154,174 )
How can I increase my downloads?