Risk and Responsibility: A Complex and Evolving Relationship

Science and Engineering Ethics 18 (1):91-102 (2012)
Abstract
This paper analyses the nature of the relationship between risk and responsibility. Since neither the concept of risk nor the concept of responsibility has an unequivocal definition, it is obvious that there is no single interpretation of their relationship. After introducing the different meanings of responsibility used in this paper, we analyse four conceptions of risk. This allows us to make their link with responsibility explicit and to determine if a shift in the connection between risk and responsibility can be outlined. (1) In the engineer’s paradigm, the quantitative conception of risk does not include any concept of responsibility. Their relationship is indirect, the locus of responsibility being risk management. (2) In Mary Douglas’ cultural theory, risks are constructed through the responsibilities they engage. (3) Rayner and (4) Wolff go further by integrating forms of responsibility in the definition of risk itself. Analysis of these four frameworks shows that the concepts of risk and responsibility are increasingly intertwined. This tendency is reinforced by increasing public awareness and a call for the integration of a moral dimension in risk management. Therefore, we suggest that a form of virtue-responsibility should also be integrated in the concept of risk.
Keywords Risk  Responsibility  Models of risk  Cultural theory  Virtue
Categories (categorize this paper)
DOI 10.1007/s11948-010-9246-y
Options
 Save to my reading list
Follow the author(s)
Edit this record
My bibliography
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Mark as duplicate
Request removal from index
Revision history
Download options
Our Archive


Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy     Papers currently archived: 30,810
Through your library
References found in this work BETA
Risk and Rationality.Kristin Shrader-Frechette - 1991 - University of California Press.
Philosophical Perspectives on Risk.Sven Ove Hansson - 2004 - Techné: Research in Philosophy and Technology 8 (1):10-35.
Risk, Fear, Blame, Shame and the Regulation of Public Safety.Jonathan Wolff - 2006 - Economics and Philosophy 22 (3):409-427.
Bhopal: An Essay on Moral Responsibility and Civic Virtue.John Ladd - 1991 - Journal of Social Philosophy 22 (1):73-91.
Cultural Theory and Risk Analysis.Steve Rayner - 1992 - In S. Krimsky & D. Golding (eds.), Social Theories of Risk. Praeger. pp. 83--115.

View all 6 references / Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

Add more citations

Similar books and articles
Varieties of Risk Representations.John Kadvany - 1997 - Journal of Social Philosophy 28 (3):123-143.
Luck, Risk, and Blame.Stale Fredriksen - 2005 - Journal of Medicine and Philosophy 30 (5):535 – 553.
Responsibility and Obligation: Some Kantian Directions.Suzanne M. Uniacke - 2005 - International Journal of Philosophical Studies 13 (4):461 – 475.
Added to PP index
2010-11-22

Total downloads
37 ( #144,480 of 2,202,780 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
4 ( #61,822 of 2,202,780 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Monthly downloads
My notes
Sign in to use this feature