In Maarten Franssen, Peter Kroes, Pieter Vermaas & Thomas A. C. Reydon (eds.), Artefact Kinds: Ontology and the Human-made World. Synthese Library (2013)
My starting point is that discussions in philosophy about the ontology of technical artifacts ought to be informed by classificatory practices in engineering. Hence, the heuristic value of the natural-artificial distinction in engineering counts against arguments which favour abandoning the distinction in metaphysics. In this chapter, I present the philosophical equipment needed to analyse classificatory practices and then present a case study of engineering practice using these theoretical tools. More in particular, I make use of the Collectivist Account of Technical Artifacts (CAT) according to which there are different classificatory practices for natural, artificial, and social objects. I demonstrate that in the community studied, artificial kinds are marked by distinctive classificatory practices. The presence of these distinctive classificatory practices in engineering with regard to artificial kinds should inform discussions about the ontology of technical artifacts just as the distinctive classificatory practices in natural science inform discussions about natural kinds.
|Keywords||ontology philosophy of engineering collectivism Martin Kusch sociology of scientific knowledge|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
References found in this work BETA
No references found.
Citations of this work BETA
No citations found.
Similar books and articles
The Shrinking Difference Between Artifacts and Natural Objects.Lynne Rudder Baker - 2008 - American Philosophical Association Newsletter on Philosophy and Computers.
Science, Technology and Experiments; The Natural Versus the Artificial.Peter Kroes - 1994 - PSA: Proceedings of the Biennial Meeting of the Philosophy of Science Association 1994:431-440.
Cognitive Modeling and Representation of Knowledge in Ontological Engineering.Christine W. Chan - 2003 - Brain and Mind 4 (2):269-282.
Technological Biology? Things and Kinds in Synthetic Biology.Pablo Schyfter - 2012 - Biology and Philosophy 27 (1):29-48.
The Place of Engineering and the Engineering of Place.Gene Moriarty - 2000 - Techné: Research in Philosophy and Technology 5 (2):83-96.
How to Fix Kind Membership: A Problem for Hpc Theory and a Solution.Thomas Reydon - 2009 - Philosophy of Science 76 (5):724-736.
Natural Kinds in Evolution and Systematics: Metaphysical and Epistemological Considerations.Ingo Brigandt - 2009 - Acta Biotheoretica 57 (1-2):77-97.
The Problem of Processes and Transitions: Are Diseases Phase Kinds? [REVIEW]Stefan Dragulinescu - 2012 - Medicine, Health Care and Philosophy 15 (1):79-89.
Technical Artifacts, Engineering Practice, and Emergence.Peter Kroes - 2009 - In Ulrich Krohs & Peter Kroes (eds.), Functions in Biological and Artificial Worlds: Comparative Philosophical Perspectives. MIT Press.
Do the Life Sciences Need Natural Kinds?Thomas A. C. Reydon - 2009 - Croatian Journal of Philosophy 9 (2):167-190.
Realism and Human Kinds.Amie L. Thomasson - 2003 - Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 67 (3):580–609.
The Natural Shiftiness of Natural Kinds.Sousa Ronald De - 1984 - Canadian Journal of Philosophy 14 (4):561 - 580.
‘Community as the Basis of Free Individual Action’.Kenneth R. Westphal - 1994 - In M. Daly (ed.), Communitarianism. Wadsworth.
Scientific Enquiry and Natural Kinds: From Planets to Mallards.P. D. Magnus - 2012 - Palgrave-Macmillan.
Added to index2012-04-14
Total downloads7 ( #509,164 of 2,146,482 )
Recent downloads (6 months)1 ( #386,101 of 2,146,482 )
How can I increase my downloads?
There are no threads in this forum
Nothing in this forum yet.