The Case Against Reparations

Authors
Stephen Kershnar
Fredonia State University
Abstract
George Schedler raises interesting issues with regard to the amount of reparations owed for slavery, the parties who are owed reparations, and the standard for these reparations. His arguments, however, do not hold up upon analysis. His analysis of the case for the descendants of slaves being owed compensation seriously overestimates the case for such reparations. He does not identify the grounds for such compensation, i.e., either stolen inheritance or the descendants’ trustee-like control over the slave’s estate, and this results in his not identifying the metaphysical and epistemic problems that accompany the descendants’ claim to reparations. In analyzing whether the U.S. government owes compensation, Schedler provides arguments based on its small role in bringing about slavery and the break in national identity that followed the Civil War. Such arguments fail but his conclusion can be supported by other arguments, specifically the nature of the federal government’s relation to slavery and the limited nature of its powers. Thus, the case against reparations is overwhelming but not for the reasons Schedler provides
Keywords Applied Philosophy  Contemporary Philosophy
Categories (categorize this paper)
ISBN(s) 1077-1999
DOI 10.5840/pcw2001815
Options
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Request removal from index
Revision history

Download options

Our Archive


Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy     Papers currently archived: 38,035
External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
Through your library

References found in this work BETA

No references found.

Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

No citations found.

Add more citations

Similar books and articles

Sartre, Fanon, and the Case for Slavery Reparations.Chris Buck - 2004 - Sartre Studies International 10 (2):123-138.
Reconciliation and Reparations.Howard Mcgary - 2010 - Metaphilosophy 41 (4):546-562.
Reparations: Interdisciplinary Inquiries.Jon Miller & Rahul Kumar (eds.) - 2007 - Oxford University Press.
Should the Federal Government Pay Reparations for Slavery?George Schedler - 2003 - Social Theory and Practice 29 (4):567-588.
Reparations and Racial Inequality.Derrick Darby - 2010 - Philosophy Compass 5 (1):55-66.
A Two-Tiered Reparations Theory: A Reply to Wenar.Thom Brooks - 2008 - Journal of Social Philosophy 39 (4):666-669.
The Handbook of Reparations.De Greiff Pablo (ed.) - 2006 - Oxford University Press.
Principles for Measuring the Damages of American Slavery.George Schedlerf - 2002 - Public Affairs Quarterly, 16 (4):377-404.
Reparations in Democratic Transitions.Ernesto Verdeja - 2006 - Res Publica 12 (2):115-136.

Analytics

Added to PP index
2012-03-18

Total views
51 ( #133,308 of 2,312,725 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
8 ( #82,639 of 2,312,725 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Monthly downloads

My notes

Sign in to use this feature