Journal of Social Philosophy 34 (2):267–284 (2003)

Authors
Stephen Kershnar
Fredonia State University
Abstract
The most qualified applicant is the one who has the propensity to maximally satisfy the employer’s preferences. An applicant’s propensity is a function of her willingness to work hard together with the relevant capacity or potentiality to do the tasks constituting a job. Given this account of the most qualified applicant, there is only a weak duty, if any, to hire persons based on their being the most qualified. Such a duty is not justified by reference to rights, desert, fairness, or the maximization of welfare. However, such a duty may come about via promises made by the employer or the employee who does the hiring. These results suggest that anti-discrimination laws cannot be justified based on merit, although other justifications might still be available.
Keywords Discrimination  Race Discrimination  Sex Discrimination  Merit  Civil Rights
Categories (categorize this paper)
DOI 10.1111/1467-9833.00180
Options
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Request removal from index
Revision history

Download options

PhilArchive copy


Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy     Papers currently archived: 63,206
Through your library

References found in this work BETA

No references found.

Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

Networking, Corruption, and Subversion.Ned Dobos - 2017 - Journal of Business Ethics 144 (3):467-478.

Add more citations

Similar books and articles

Analytics

Added to PP index
2009-01-28

Total views
81 ( #132,377 of 2,448,355 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
16 ( #42,136 of 2,448,355 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads

My notes