Treating others merely as means

Utilitas 21 (2):163-180 (2009)
Samuel Kerstein
University of Maryland, College Park
In the Formula of Humanity, Kant embraces the principle that it is wrong for us to treat others merely as means. For contemporary Kantian ethicists, this Mere Means Principle plays the role of a moral constraint: it limits what we may do, even in the service of promoting the overall good. But substantive interpretations of the principle generate implausible results in relatively ordinary cases. On one interpretation, for example, you treat your opponent in a tennis tournament merely as a means and thus wrongly when you try, through defeating him, to win first place. The article aims to develop a reconstruction of the Mere Means Principle that has more plausible implications than do rival reconstructions. It sets out a sufficient condition for an agent's treating another merely as a means. This condition is intended to be Kantian, but not necessarily one that Kant endorses.
Keywords No keywords specified (fix it)
Categories (categorize this paper)
DOI 10.1017/S0953820809003458
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Request removal from index
Revision history

Download options

Our Archive

Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy     Papers currently archived: 33,741
Through your library

References found in this work BETA

No references found.

Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

Autonomy, Moral Constraints, and Markets in Kidneys.S. J. Kerstein - 2009 - Journal of Medicine and Philosophy 34 (6):573-585.

View all 8 citations / Add more citations

Similar books and articles


Added to PP index

Total downloads
137 ( #41,734 of 2,263,108 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
7 ( #53,219 of 2,263,108 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Monthly downloads

My notes

Sign in to use this feature