Analysis 62 (1):92–93 (2002)

Authors
Abstract
We can modify Hume’s Principle in the same manner that George Boolos suggested for modifying Frege’s Basic Law V. This leads to the principle Small Hume. Then, we can show that Small Hume is interderivable with Hume’s Principle
Keywords Hume
Categories (categorize this paper)
Reprint years 2006
DOI 10.1111/1467-8284.00336
Options
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Request removal from index
Revision history

Download options

Our Archive


Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy     Papers currently archived: 50,241
Through your library

References found in this work BETA

No references found.

Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

No citations found.

Add more citations

Similar books and articles

David Hume and Eighteenth-Century America.Mark G. Spencer - 2005 - University of Rochester Press.
A New Interpretation of Hume's 'Of Miracles'.Chris Slupik - 1995 - Religious Studies 31 (4):517 - 536.
Hume on the Distinction of Reason.Paul Hoffman - 2011 - British Journal for the History of Philosophy 19 (6):1131 - 1141.
Sympathy and Benevolence in Hume's Moral Psychology.Rico Vitz - 2004 - Journal of the History of Philosophy 42 (3):261-275.
Hume’s Progressive View of Human Nature.Michael Gill - 2000 - Hume Studies 26 (1):87-108.
To Err is Humeant.Mark Wilson - 1999 - Philosophia Mathematica 7 (3):247-257.
Is Hume's Principle Analytic?Crispin Wright - 2001 - In Bob Hale & Crispin Wright (eds.), Notre Dame Journal of Formal Logic. Oxford University Press. pp. 307-333.

Analytics

Added to PP index
2009-01-28

Total views
197 ( #42,283 of 2,325,146 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
2 ( #455,085 of 2,325,146 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads

My notes