Informed consent in clinical practice

HEC Forum 15 (1):42-54 (2003)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

In this paper I attempt to show that the doctrine of informed consent, as practiced in the relationships between physicians and patients, often does not fulfill its main purpose, i.e., it does not safeguard the interests, rights, and dignity of patients. This happens because of clinicians' skepticism about the existence of the right to informed consent, patients' disinclination to make decisions, the current nature of health care, and the absence of clear guidelines about implementing informed consent. In the context of this paper informed consent refers to the principle of respect for autonomy.

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 92,168

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Analytics

Added to PP
2009-01-28

Downloads
56 (#286,778)

6 months
8 (#367,748)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

Add more citations

References found in this work

The silent world of doctor and patient.Jay Katz - 1984 - Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press.

Add more references