Jacquette on Grelling’s Paradox

Analysis 65 (3):258–260 (2005)

Abstract

This discusses a mistake (concerning what a definition is) in “Grelling’s revenge”, Analysis 64, 251-6 (2004), by Dale Jacquette, who claims that the simple theory of types is inconsistent

Download options

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 72,879

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Analytics

Added to PP
2009-01-28

Downloads
127 (#94,758)

6 months
1 (#386,016)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

References found in this work

Philosophy of Logics.Susan Haack - 1978 - London and New York: Cambridge University Press.
Philosophy of Logics.Susan Haack - 1978 - Philosophy 56 (217):435-436.
Philosophy of Logics.Susan Haack - 1980 - Mind 89 (354):303-306.
Grelling's Revenge.D. Jacquette - 2004 - Analysis 64 (3):251-256.

Add more references

Citations of this work

Syntactical Constraints on Definitions.Dale Jacquette - 2013 - Metaphilosophy 44 (1-2):145-156.

Add more citations

Similar books and articles

Idealism and Williams's Semantic Paradox.Dale Jacquette - 2004 - Philosophical Investigations 27 (2):117–128.
Grelling’s Paradox.Jay Newhard - 2005 - Philosophical Studies 126 (1):1 - 27.
On Grelling's Paradox.Robert L. Martin - 1968 - Philosophical Review 77 (3):321-331.
Burleigh's Paradox.Dale Jacquette - 2007 - Philosophy 82 (3):437-448.
Forrester's Paradox.Dale Jacquette - 1986 - Dialogue 25 (4):761-.
The Validity Paradox in Modal S.Dale Jacquette - 1996 - Synthese 109 (1):47 - 62.
Categories of Linguistic Aspects and Grelling's Paradox.Laurence Goldstein - 1980 - Linguistics and Philosophy 4 (3):405 - 421.