Analysis 65 (3):258–260 (2005)

Authors
Abstract
This discusses a mistake (concerning what a definition is) in “Grelling’s revenge”, Analysis 64, 251-6 (2004), by Dale Jacquette, who claims that the simple theory of types is inconsistent
Keywords No keywords specified (fix it)
Categories (categorize this paper)
Reprint years 2006
DOI 10.1111/j.1467-8284.2005.00561.x
Options
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Request removal from index
Revision history

Download options

PhilArchive copy


Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy     Papers currently archived: 58,425
Through your library

References found in this work BETA

Philosophy of Logics.Susan Haack - 1978 - Cambridge University Press.
Grelling's Revenge.D. Jacquette - 2004 - Analysis 64 (3):251-256.
Philosophy of Logics.Susan Haack - 1980 - Mind 89 (354):303-306.

Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

Syntactical Constraints on Definitions.Dale Jacquette - 2013 - Metaphilosophy 44 (1-2):145-156.

Add more citations

Similar books and articles

Idealism and Williams's Semantic Paradox.Dale Jacquette - 2004 - Philosophical Investigations 27 (2):117–128.
Grelling’s Paradox.Jay Newhard - 2005 - Philosophical Studies 126 (1):1 - 27.
On Grelling's Paradox.Robert L. Martin - 1968 - Philosophical Review 77 (3):321-331.
Burleigh's Paradox.Dale Jacquette - 2007 - Philosophy 82 (3):437-448.
Forrester's Paradox.Dale Jacquette - 1986 - Dialogue 25 (4):761-.
The Validity Paradox in Modal S.Dale Jacquette - 1996 - Synthese 109 (1):47 - 62.
Categories of Linguistic Aspects and Grelling's Paradox.Laurence Goldstein - 1980 - Linguistics and Philosophy 4 (3):405 - 421.

Analytics

Added to PP index
2009-01-28

Total views
126 ( #79,029 of 2,420,821 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
1 ( #543,487 of 2,420,821 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads

My notes