Yablo’s Paradox and ω-Inconsistency

Synthese 145 (3):295-302 (2005)
  Copy   BIBTEX


It is argued that Yablo’s Paradox is not strictly paradoxical, but rather ‘ω-paradoxical’. Under a natural formalization, the list of Yablo sentences may be constructed using a diagonalization argument and can be shown to be ω-inconsistent, but nonetheless consistent. The derivation of an inconsistency requires a uniform fixed-point construction. Moreover, the truth-theoretic disquotational principle required is also uniform, rather than the local disquotational T-scheme. The theory with the local disquotation T-scheme applied to individual sentences from the Yablo list is also consistent



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 93,127

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library


Added to PP

221 (#95,027)

6 months
11 (#272,000)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Citations of this work

In Defence of Radical Restrictionism.David Liggins - 2019 - Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 98 (1):3-25.
Reference and Truth.Lavinia Picollo - 2020 - Journal of Philosophical Logic 49 (3):439-474.
Valuing and believing valuable.Kubala Robbie - 2017 - Analysis 77 (1):59-65.

View all 31 citations / Add more citations

References found in this work

Paradox without Self-Reference.Stephen Yablo - 1993 - Analysis 53 (4):251-252.
Yablo’s paradox.Graham Priest - 1997 - Analysis 57 (4):236–242.
Models of Peano Arithmetic.Richard Kaye - 1991 - Clarendon Press.

Add more references