Authors
Kathleen Akins
Simon Fraser University
Nazim Keven
Bilkent University
Abstract
In our target article, we argued that the positive results of neonatal imitation are likely to be by-products of normal aerodigestive development. Our hypothesis elicited various responses on the role of social interaction in infancy, the methodological issues about imitation experiments, and the relation between the aerodigestive theory and the development of speech. Here we respond to the commentaries.
Keywords No keywords specified (fix it)
Categories (categorize this paper)
DOI 10.1017/S0140525X17001923
Options
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Request removal from index
Revision history

Download options

PhilArchive copy


Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy     Papers currently archived: 68,975
External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
Through your library

References found in this work BETA

Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

No citations found.

Add more citations

Similar books and articles

Ethical Considerations of the Perinatal Necropsy.T. Y. Khong - 1996 - Journal of Medical Ethics 22 (2):111-114.
Birth Management and Perinatal Care.Michael E. Lamb - 1993 - Human Nature 4 (4):323-328.
Imitation in Infancy.Jacqueline Nadel & George Butterworth (eds.) - 2011 - Cambridge University Press.
Infant Imitation and the Self—A Response to Welsh.Jane Lymer - 2012 - Philosophical Psychology (2):1-23.

Analytics

Added to PP index
2017-12-14

Total views
12 ( #805,610 of 2,498,178 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
2 ( #282,957 of 2,498,178 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads

My notes