Journal of the History of Philosophy 48 (1):111-112 (2010)

This volume contains ten essays that treat the relationship between Kant’s philosophy and those of his predecessors in the early modern canon. The essays divide into five pairs devoted respectively to Descartes, Leibniz, Locke, Berkeley, and Hume. In each case, the work of a prominent Kant scholar precedes a reply by an early modernist. This format provides the opportunity to reevaluate both Kant’s philosophy and those of his predecessors, the contention being that the latter “in our historical conscience” too often are read “in light of Kant’s reconstruction of their thought”.In this review, I discuss a selection of the articles in order to evaluate the extent to which they contribute to the stated historiographic aim of the volume. Each of the ten contributions provides a worthwhile read in isolation from the others, but the success they achieve in reassessing the relationship of Kantian to pre-Kantian philosophy varies significantly from essay to essay. Cumulatively, they offer an inspiring retort to the central arguments of that chapter of modern philosophy entitled “On the division of all philosophies into vorkantische and nachkantische
Keywords No keywords specified (fix it)
Categories (categorize this paper)
DOI 10.1353/hph.0.0192
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Request removal from index
Revision history

Download options

PhilArchive copy

Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy     Papers currently archived: 58,849
External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
Through your library

References found in this work BETA

No references found.

Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

No citations found.

Add more citations

Similar books and articles

Review: Forster, Michael N., Kant and Skepticism[REVIEW]Anthony Brueckner - 2008 - Notre Dame Philosophical Reviews 2008 (7).
Review: Garber & Longuenesse (Ed), Kant and the Early Moderns. [REVIEW]Kevin J. Harrelson - 2010 - Journal of the History of Philosophy 48 (1):111-112.
Kant's Thinker (Review).Brandon C. Look - 2011 - Journal of the History of Philosophy 49 (4):502-503.
Kant's Theory of Virtue: The Value of Autocracy (Review).Robert B. Louden - 2012 - Journal of the History of Philosophy 50 (1):142-143.


Added to PP index

Total views
25 ( #423,511 of 2,426,099 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
6 ( #122,224 of 2,426,099 )

How can I increase my downloads?


My notes