Philosophy in the Contemporary World 10 (1):29-35 (2003)
The “Idea of Intrinsic Equality” is central to democracy, but in what respects are persons intrinsically equal, and what requirements, if any, does their equality impose on a process for making collective decisions? This paper seeks to answer that question with respect to our own representative democracy. It examines three theories of collective decision-making that arguably characterize the democratic process under the United States Constitution. It concludes that, while all preserve the Idea of Intrinsic Equality in the election of representatives and legislative voting, only the third theory, Democratic Egalitarianism, which treats all like interests alike in promulgating laws and preserves the fundamental liberties of all, both preserves the Idea of Intrinsic Equality throughout the legislative process and fulfills the fiduciary mandate that legislators legislate in the interests of the people
|Keywords||Applied Philosophy Contemporary Philosophy|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
References found in this work BETA
No references found.
Citations of this work BETA
No citations found.
Similar books and articles
The Constitution of Equality: Democratic Authority and its Limits.Thomas Christiano - 2008 - Oxford University Press.
Seen to Be Done: The Roots and Fruits of Public Equality. [REVIEW]Arto Laitinen - 2010 - Res Publica 16 (1):83-88.
Giving a Voice to Posterity – Deliberative Democracy and Representation of Future People.Kristian Skagen Ekeli - 2005 - Journal of Agricultural and Environmental Ethics 18 (5):429-450.
Democracy and the Limits of Self-Government.Adam Przeworski (ed.) - 2010 - Cambridge University Press.
An Epistemic Defense of Democracy: David Estlund's Democratic Authority.Elizabeth Anderson - 2008 - Episteme 5 (1):pp. 129-139.
Castoriadis and the Modern Political Imaginary—Oligarchy, Representation, Democracy.Christophe Premat - 2006 - Critical Horizons 7 (1):251-275.
The Political Egalitarian's Dilemma.Fabienne Peter - 2007 - Ethical Theory and Moral Practice 10 (4):373 - 387.
"Which is to Be Master?"-The Indefensibility of Political Representation.Gerard Casey - 2009 - Philosophical Inquiry 31 (3-4):1-10.
Guizot's Elitist Theory of Representative Government.Aurelian Craiutu - 2003 - Critical Review 15 (3-4):261-284.
Added to index2011-01-09
Total downloads24 ( #212,977 of 2,177,986 )
Recent downloads (6 months)1 ( #317,201 of 2,177,986 )
How can I increase my downloads?