The meaning of mystical ‘darkness’

Religious Studies 41 (1):95-105 (2005)
  Copy   BIBTEX


Arguments by W. T. Stace and C. J. Insole show that metaphorical descriptions of God presuppose literal descriptions of God. This poses a problem for the metaphor of darkness which has often been used, for instance by Pseudo-Dionysius, in the context of negative theology and apophatic mysticism. Three strategies of dealing with the problem are discussed in this article. The negative, apophatic approach can be seen either as subverting itself, or as being restricted to certain properties, or as resting on a self-excluding principle. Whereas the first two strategies have their difficulties, self-exclusion is linguistically founded and adequate to the purposes of negative theology



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 92,931

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

The Unspoken.Jean-Luc Marion & Arianne Conty - 2002 - Proceedings of the American Catholic Philosophical Association 76:39-56.
Quantum Chaos and Semiclassical Mechanics.Robert Batterman - 1992 - PSA: Proceedings of the Biennial Meeting of the Philosophy of Science Association 1992:50-65.
Darkness Visible?Briggs Wright - 2012 - Australasian Journal of Philosophy 90 (1):39 - 55.


Added to PP

52 (#314,382)

6 months
10 (#309,344)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Peter Kügler
University of Innsbruck

Citations of this work

The logical challenge of negative theology.Piotr Urbańczyk - 2018 - Studies in Logic, Grammar and Rhetoric 54 (1):149-174.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references