Religious Studies 41 (1):95-105 (2005)
Arguments by W. T. Stace and C. J. Insole show that metaphorical descriptions of God presuppose literal descriptions of God. This poses a problem for the metaphor of darkness which has often been used, for instance by Pseudo-Dionysius, in the context of negative theology and apophatic mysticism. Three strategies of dealing with the problem are discussed in this article. The negative, apophatic approach can be seen either as subverting itself, or as being restricted to certain properties, or as resting on a self-excluding principle. Whereas the first two strategies have their difficulties, self-exclusion is linguistically founded and adequate to the purposes of negative theology
|Keywords||No keywords specified (fix it)|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
References found in this work BETA
No references found.
Citations of this work BETA
No citations found.
Similar books and articles
Bonaventure's Contribution to the Twentieth Century Debate on Apophatic Theology.Adriaan T. Peperzak - 1998 - Faith and Philosophy 15 (2):181-192.
A Novel Interpretation of Plato's Theory of Forms.P. X. Monaghan - 2010 - Metaphysica 11 (1):63-78.
Commodification or Compensation: A Reply to Ketchum.H. M. Malm - 1989 - Hypatia 4 (3):128-135.
From 1984 to One-Dimensional Man: Critical Reflections on Orwell and Marcuse.Douglas Kellner - unknown
Quantum Chaos and Semiclassical Mechanics.Robert Batterman - 1992 - PSA: Proceedings of the Biennial Meeting of the Philosophy of Science Association 1992:50-65.
Added to index2009-01-28
Total downloads24 ( #210,639 of 2,169,334 )
Recent downloads (6 months)1 ( #345,568 of 2,169,334 )
How can I increase my downloads?