Authors
Muhammad Ali Khalidi
CUNY Graduate Center
Abstract
One contentious issue in contemporary interpretations of medieval Islamic philosophy is the degree of esotericism espoused by its proponents, and therefore the degree of interpretive effort required by its modem readers to ascertain the author's real beliefs. One philosopher who has been accused of esotericism is Averroes (Ibn Rushd), particularly because he is quite explicit in distinguishing among the different types of reasoning appropriate to different classes of people: philosophers, theologians, and laypersons. But on closer inspection Averroes appears to have at his disposal some subtle strategies for achieving partial reconciliation between religion and philosophy, strategies which do not actually involve falsifying the views of either side, although that is how it might appear at first sight. These polemical devices appear most clearly in his exchanges with the theologians (mutakallimun) of the Ash'arite school, of which Ghazali is the most original representative. In this paper I will examine Averroes's position on two sensitive matters, the creation of the universe and the possibility of miracles, in order to illustrate the use of what may be called his "method of re-interpretation," whereby certain key terms are interpreted in such a way as to emphasize the agreements between the two sides while downplaying the differences.
Keywords History of Philosophy  Ibn Rushd  Ghazali  esotericism  miracle
Categories (categorize this paper)
ISBN(s) 0019-0365
DOI 10.5840/ipq19983824
Options
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Request removal from index
Revision history

Download options

PhilArchive copy

 PhilArchive page | Other versions
External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
Through your library

References found in this work BETA

No references found.

Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

No citations found.

Add more citations

Similar books and articles

Averroes and the Teleological Argument.Taneli Kukkonen - 2002 - Religious Studies 38 (4):405-428.
Kant-Forschungen Als Beispiel Für Selbstverschuldeten Methodenmangel.Werner Loh - 1992 - Journal for General Philosophy of Science / Zeitschrift für Allgemeine Wissenschaftstheorie 23 (1):105 - 128.
Al-Miklātī, a Twelfth Century Ašʿarite Reader of Averroes.Yamina Adouhane - 2012 - Arabic Sciences and Philosophy 22 (2):155-197.
Averroes on Plato's "Republic". Averroes - 1974 - Cornell University Press.

Analytics

Added to PP index
2011-01-09

Total views
83 ( #138,407 of 2,498,793 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
18 ( #46,526 of 2,498,793 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads

My notes