Deciphering mirror neurons: Rational decision versus associative learning

Behavioral and Brain Sciences 37 (2):206-207 (2014)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

The rational-decision approach is superior to the associative-learning approach of Cook et al. at explaining why mirror neurons (MNs) fire or do not fire – even when the stimulus is the same. The rational-decision approach is superior because it starts with the analysis of the intention of the organism, i.e., with the identification of the specific objective or goal that the organism is trying to maximize.

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 91,219

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Making sense of mirror neurons.Lawrence Shapiro - 2009 - Synthese 167 (3):439 - 456.
If mirror neurons are the answer, what was the question?Emma Borg - 2007 - Journal of Consciousness Studies 14 (8):5-19.
Where do mirror neurons come from.Cecilia Heyes - forthcoming - Neuroscience and Biobehavioral Reviews.
Mirror Neurons and Social Cognition.Shannon Spaulding - 2013 - Mind and Language 28 (2):233-257.
Mirror neurons and the phenomenology of intersubjectivity.Dieter Lohmar - 2006 - Phenomenology and the Cognitive Sciences 5 (1):5-16.
Mirror neurons' registration of biological motion.Loraine McCune - 2002 - In Maxim I. Stamenov & Vittorio Gallese (eds.), Mirror Neurons and the Evolution of Brain and Language. John Benjamins. pp. 42--315.
dialogic interaction Mirror neurons and what they tell.Edda Weigand - 2002 - In Maxim I. Stamenov & Vittorio Gallese (eds.), Mirror Neurons and the Evolution of Brain and Language. John Benjamins. pp. 42--229.

Analytics

Added to PP
2014-09-23

Downloads
8 (#1,249,165)

6 months
1 (#1,459,555)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

References found in this work

Add more references