Critical Discourse Studies 7 (1):55-72 (2010)

CDA studies on out-groups, i.e. immigrants, within Wodak's Discourse-Historical and van Dijk's Socio-cognitive approaches along other approaches, have suggested methods and analytical categories through which discursive representations of social groups are investigated. Consequently, several listings of relevant analytical categories have been proposed and applied to many subsequent studies. However, the variety of the proposed methods in representation of social groups by various scholars and the often unclear accounts for the links among various levels of discourse analysis seem to have created a multitude of discursive strategies that can be overwhelming if not confusing. This paper is an attempt to make explicit various levels of discourse analysis on representation of social groups from detailed textual analysis to discourse topics and tries to show how micro-level analytical categories are related to macro-structure within various levels of contexts. Specifically, a three-level analytical framework is suggested for textual analysis of the representation of social groups which divides the text analysis into three domains of social actors, social actions and argumentation. It is suggested that the analysis should look at what is in the text in terms of the three domains mentioned, and investigate how these domains are linguistically realized through a set of linguistic processes/mechanisms.
Keywords No keywords specified (fix it)
Categories No categories specified
(categorize this paper)
DOI 10.1080/17405900903453948
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Request removal from index
Revision history

Download options

PhilArchive copy

Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy     Papers currently archived: 69,177
External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
Through your library

References found in this work BETA

View all 8 references / Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

Well, in the Case of My Mom….Ekaterina Lukianova & Timothy Steffensmeier - 2020 - Journal of Argumentation in Context 9 (3):315-341.

View all 7 citations / Add more citations

Similar books and articles

Reductionism in Fallacy Theory.Christoph Lumer - 2000 - Argumentation 14 (4):405-423.
Culpable Control and Deviant Causal Chains.Mark Alicke & David Rose - 2012 - Personality and Social Psychology Compass 6 (10):723-735.
The Functions of Attributions.Donelson R. Forsyth - 1980 - Social Psychology Quarterly 43 (2):184-189.
The Construction of Ontological Categories.Jan Westerhoff - 2004 - Australasian Journal of Philosophy 82 (4):595 – 620.
Consequences and Privileged Act Descriptions.Patricia Mary Lourdes Illingworth - 1985 - Dissertation, University of California, Irvine
The Objective Bases of Max Weber's Ideal Types.Donald McIntosh - 1977 - History and Theory 16 (3):265-279.
A Dialectical Approach to Action Theory.John M. Connolly - 1976 - Inquiry: An Interdisciplinary Journal of Philosophy 19 (1-4):427 – 442.
The Actor, the Pilgrim and the Fieldpath.Andrea Copeliovitch - 2015 - Human and Social Studies 4 (3):123-136.
Can a Single Action Have Many Different Descriptions?Arthur B. Cody - 1967 - Inquiry: An Interdisciplinary Journal of Philosophy 10 (1-4):164 – 180.


Added to PP index

Total views
7 ( #1,064,240 of 2,499,615 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
2 ( #278,169 of 2,499,615 )

How can I increase my downloads?


My notes