Christian Bioethics 5 (2):154-182 (1999)

Abstract
Current philosophical and legal bioethical reflection on reprogenetics provides little more than a rationalization of the interests of science. There are two reasons for this. First, bioethicists attempt to address ethical issues in a “language of precision” that characterizes science, and this works against analogical and narratological modes of discourse that have traditionally provided guidance for understanding human nature and purpose. Second, the current ethical and legal debate is framed by a public/private distinction that banishes robust norms to the private realm, and leaves a minimalist public discourse of harm avoidance that is insufficient for regulating the science. In this essay, I argue that Mark Hanson's account of anxiety provides a valuable starting point for addressing deficiencies in the current philosophical and legal debate, and it highlights the need for a theological discourse on genetic enhancements. Through an assessment of Joel Shumann's criticism of the public/private distinction, I show how the needed theological discourse should be situated in the context of robust communities, and how such a communitarian inter-ethic is compatible with a variant of liberalism. Finally, I critically assess James Keenan's account of virtue and perfection, in order to outline what a sufficient discourse on reproductive and genetic enhancements requires
Keywords No keywords specified (fix it)
Categories (categorize this paper)
DOI 10.1093/chbi.5.2.154.3791
Options
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Request removal from index
Revision history

Download options

PhilArchive copy


Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy     Papers currently archived: 56,949
Through your library

References found in this work BETA

Philosophy and the Mirror of Nature.R. Rorty - 1979 - Princeton University Press.
Sources of the Self: The Making of Modern Identity.Charles Taylor - 1994 - Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 54 (1):187-190.
Sources of the Self.Allen W. Wood - 1992 - Philosophical Review 101 (3):621.

View all 36 references / Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

No citations found.

Add more citations

Similar books and articles

Genetic Enhancements and Expectations.K. Sorensen - 2009 - Journal of Medical Ethics 35 (7):433-435.
Of Maize and Men: Reproductive Control and the Threat to Genetic Diversity.David B. Resnik - 2000 - Journal of Medicine and Philosophy 25 (4):451 – 467.
Engineering Genetic Injustice.Peter Wenz - 2005 - Bioethics 19 (1):1–11.
Are “Genetic Enhancements” Really Enhancements?Darren Shickle - 2000 - Cambridge Quarterly of Healthcare Ethics 9 (3):342-352.
Does Justice Require Genetic Enhancements?N. Holtug - 1999 - Journal of Medical Ethics 25 (2):137-143.
One Danger of Biomedical Enhancements.Alex Rajczi - 2008 - Bioethics 22 (6):328–336.
Germ-Line Genetic Enhancements and Rawlsian Primary Goods.Fritz Allhoff - 2007 - Journal of Philosophical Research 32 (Supplement):217-230.
Respecting Privacy in Detecting Illegitimate Enhancements in Athletes.Sarah Teetzel - 2007 - Sport, Ethics and Philosophy 1 (2):159 – 170.
Law and Policy in the Era of Reproductive Genetics.T. Caulfield - 2004 - Journal of Medical Ethics 30 (4):414-417.

Analytics

Added to PP index
2010-08-24

Total views
41 ( #246,516 of 2,409,939 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
1 ( #541,494 of 2,409,939 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads

My notes