How are scientific corrections made?

Science and Engineering Ethics 1 (4):347-356 (1995)
Abstract
This paper provides examples drawn from the author’s experience that support the conclusion that errors and deceptions in archival science are often not easily or quickly corrected. The difficulty in correcting errors and deceptions needs wider recognition if it is to be overcome. In addition, the paper discusses how subtle abuses introduce errors into the archival literature.
Keywords No keywords specified (fix it)
Categories (categorize this paper)
DOI 10.1007/BF02583252
Options
 Save to my reading list
Follow the author(s)
My bibliography
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Revision history
Request removal from index
Download options
Our Archive


Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy     Papers currently archived: 28,756
External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
Through your library
References found in this work BETA
The Structure of Scientific Revolutions.Thomas S. Kuhn - 1962 - University of Chicago Press.
Theory and Evidence.Clark Glymour - 1980 - Princeton University Press.

View all 25 references / Add more references

Citations of this work BETA
Truth and Trustworthiness in Research.Dr C. Whitbeck - 1995 - Science and Engineering Ethics 1 (4):403-416.

Add more citations

Similar books and articles

Monthly downloads

Added to index

2009-01-28

Total downloads

14 ( #336,850 of 2,177,988 )

Recent downloads (6 months)

1 ( #316,664 of 2,177,988 )

How can I increase my downloads?

My notes
Sign in to use this feature


Discussion
Order:
There  are no threads in this forum
Nothing in this forum yet.

Other forums