In Alessandra Tanesini & Michael Lynch (eds.), Polarisation, Arrogance, and Dogmatism: Philosophical Perspectives. London: Routledge (forthcoming)

Authors
Ian James Kidd
Nottingham University
Abstract
This Chapter challenges the common claim that vicious forms of argumentative practice, like interpersonal arrogance and discursive polarisation, are caused by martial metaphors, such as ARGUMENT AS WAR. I argue that the problem isn’t the metaphor, but our wider practices of metaphorising and the ways they are deformed by invidious cultural biases and prejudices. Drawing on feminist argumentation theory, I argue that misogynistic cultures distort practices of metaphorising in two ways. First, they spotlight some associations between the martial and argumentative domains while occluding others, resulting in a sort of myopia. Second, those cultures interfere with a phenomenon I label normative isomorphism – the capacity of some structural metaphors to enable (and often encourage) a transfer of normative chracater traits from the source domain to the target domain. Crucially, the normative status of character trait often changes across domains—traits that are virtuous in the martial domain are often vicious in the argumentative domain, and vice versa. Sexist myopia tends to deform practices of metaphorising by interfering with normative isomorphism by privileging the transfer across domains of traits that recapitulate invidious cultural constructions of masculinity in terms of aggression, domination, and violence. Basically, the problem isn’t the metaphors, but the cultures.
Keywords argumentation  feminist epistemology  metaphor  philosophical practice  virtue  vice
Categories (categorize this paper)
Buy the book Find it on Amazon.com
Options
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Request removal from index
Revision history

Download options

PhilArchive copy

 PhilArchive page | Other versions
External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
Through your library

References found in this work BETA

No references found.

Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

No citations found.

Add more citations

Similar books and articles

Pain and its Metaphors: A Dialogical Approach. [REVIEW]Stephen Loftus - 2011 - Journal of Medical Humanities 32 (3):213-230.
Charging Others With Epistemic Vice.Ian James Kidd - 2016 - The Monist 99 (3):181-197.
Feminist Ethics and the Metaphor of AIDS.Susan Sherwin - 2001 - Journal of Medicine and Philosophy 26 (4):343 – 364.
Receptivity as a Virtue of Argumentation.Kathryn J. Norlock - 2013 - OSSA10 Virtues of Argumentation.
More About Metaphor.Max Black - 1977 - Dialectica 31 (3‐4):431-457.
Metaphoric Models for Creative Thinking.Martin Henry Hyatt - 2000 - Dissertation, Stanford University
Inculcating Virtue in Philosophical Practice.Lou Marinoff - 2000 - Philosophy in the Contemporary World 7 (4):51-63.
Arguments and Metaphors in Philosophy.Daniel Cohen - 2004 - University Press of America.
Assessing Metaphors of Agency.Wills Jenkins - 2005 - Environmental Ethics 27 (2):135-154.

Analytics

Added to PP index
2018-08-20

Total views
66 ( #149,542 of 2,403,581 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
34 ( #24,188 of 2,403,581 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads

My notes