In Eric Dietrich & Zach Weber (eds.), Essays in Philosophy. pp. 312--328 (2011)

Authors
Ian James Kidd
Nottingham University
Abstract
Contemporary metaphilosophical debates on the future of philosophy invariably include references to the natural sciences. This is wholly understandable given the cognitive and cultural authority of the sciences and their contributions to philosophical thought and practice. However such appeals to the sciences should be moderated by reflections on contingency of sciences. Using the work of contemporary historians and philosophers of science, I argue that an awareness of the radical contingency of science supports the claim that philosophy’s future should not be construed as either dependent or necessarily related to that of the sciences. Therefore contemporary debates – about the possibility of philosophy’s status as a science, say – should be tempered by an appreciation of the fact that science may cease to be a significant feature of future metaphilosophical debates. I conclude by considering the implications of this claim for assessments of the progressiveness of philosophy
Keywords No keywords specified (fix it)
Categories (categorize this paper)
Buy the book Find it on Amazon.com
Options
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Request removal from index
Revision history

Download options

PhilArchive copy


Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy     Papers currently archived: 64,046
External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
Through your library

References found in this work BETA

Other Histories, Other Biologies.Gregory Radick - 2005 - Royal Institute of Philosophy Supplement 56:3-.
Scientific Realism And The Inevitability Of Science.Howard Sankey - 2008 - Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part A 39 (2):259-264.
What is Humane Philosophy and Why is It At Risk?John Cottingham - 2009 - Royal Institute of Philosophy Supplement 65:233-255.

View all 7 references / Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

Add more citations

Similar books and articles

Historical Contingency and the Impact of Scientific Imperialism.Ian James Kidd - 2013 - International Studies in the Philosophy of Science 27 (3):317–326.
Bio-X: Removing Bodily Contingency in Regenerative Medicine.Eugene Thacker - 2002 - Journal of Medical Humanities 23 (3/4):239-253.
Absence of Contingency in the Newtonian Universe.James W. McAllister - 2004 - Foundations of Science 9 (2):191-210.
The Topography of Historical Contingency.Rob Inkpen & Derek Turner - 2012 - Journal of the Philosophy of History 6 (1):1-19.
Contingency and Divine Knowledge in Ockham.Michael J. Cholbi - 2003 - American Catholic Philosophical Quarterly 77 (1):81-91.
The Abyss of Contingency: Purposiveness and Contingency in Darwin and Kant.Barry Allen - 2003 - History of Philosophy Quarterly 20 (4):373 - 391.
Present Truth and Future Contingency.Rogers Albritton - 1957 - Philosophical Review 66 (1):29-46.

Analytics

Added to PP index
2012-08-21

Total views
54 ( #198,955 of 2,454,450 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
3 ( #225,749 of 2,454,450 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads

My notes