On obscenity: The thrill and repulsion of the morally prohibited

Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 64 (1):31-55 (2002)
  Copy   BIBTEX


The paper proceeds by criticising the central accounts of obscenity proffered by Feinberg, Scruton and the suggestive remarks of Nussbaum and goes on to argue for the following formal characterization of obscenity: x is appropriately judged obscene if and only if either x is appropriately classified as a member of a form or class of objects whose authorized purpose is to solicit and commend to us cognitive-affective responses which are internalized as morally prohibited and does so in ways found to be or which are held to warrant repulsion and does so in order to indulge first order desires held to be morally prohibited or indulge the desire to be morally transgressive or the desire to feel repulsed or afford cognitive rewards or any combination thereof or x successfully elicits cognitive-affective responses which conform to conditions -



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 74,310

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Remarks on Jove and Thor.Jeremy Gwiazda - 2008 - Faith and Philosophy 25 (1):79-86.
How to Defend Response Moralism.Allan Hazlett - 2009 - British Journal of Aesthetics 49 (3):241-255.
The Limits of Morality.Shelly Kagan - 1989 - Oxford University Press.
Uniform Exceptions and Rights Violations.Yvonne Chiu - 2010 - Social Theory and Practice 36 (1):44-77.
Suicide is Neither Rational nor Irrational.Christopher Cowley - 2006 - Ethical Theory and Moral Practice 9 (5):495 - 504.
Unselfishness.Christopher G. Framarin - 2008 - International Philosophical Quarterly 48 (1):69-83.


Added to PP

113 (#108,557)

6 months
1 (#415,900)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Matthew Kieran
University of Leeds

Citations of this work

Drawing the Line: Art Versus Pornography.Hans R. V. Maes - 2011 - Philosophy Compass 6 (6):385-397.
Amusement and Beyond.Steffen Steinert - 2017 - Dissertation, LMU München
Constructing the Meaning of Obscenity: An Empirical Investigation and an Experientialist Account. [REVIEW]Janny H. C. Leung & Marco Wan - 2012 - International Journal for the Semiotics of Law - Revue Internationale de Sémiotique Juridique 25 (3):415-430.

Add more citations

References found in this work

On Obscenity: The Thrill and Repulsion of the Morally Prohibited.Matthew Kieran - 2002 - Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 64 (1):31-55.

Add more references