Pro Tanto Rights and the Duty to Save the Greater Number

Oxford Studies in Normative Ethics 13:190-214 (2023)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

This paper has two aims. The first is to present and defend a new argument for rights contributionism – the view that the notion of a moral claim-right is a contributory (or pro tanto) rather than overall normative notion. The argument is an inference to the best explanation: it is argued that (i) there are contributory moral factors that contrast with standard moral reasons by way of having a number of formal properties that are characteristic of rights, even though they can be overridden, and (ii) that this is best explained by a view that takes these factors to correlate with rights. The second aim is to show that the truth of rights contributionism matters for normative ethics. More specifically, it is argued that rights contributionism clears the way for deontologists to justify the pre-theoretically plausible verdict that we have a duty to save the greater number in so-called Taurek scenarios – scenarios in which we have to choose between saving either a greater or a smaller number of different people. The chapter offers a novel and distinctively deontological explanation of this verdict that is based on the assumption that everyone has a pro tanto right to be saved in a Taurek scenario.

Links

PhilArchive

External links

  • This entry has no external links. Add one.
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Are There Any Conflicts of Rights?Adina Preda - 2015 - Ethical Theory and Moral Practice 18 (4):677-690.
Rights, Duties, and Moral Conflicts.Biasetti Pierfrancesco - 2014 - Etica E Politica (2):1042-1062.
From rights to prerogatives.Daniel Muñoz - 2020 - Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 102 (3):608-623.
Moral rights without balancing.Ariel Zylberman - 2021 - Philosophical Studies 179 (2):549-569.
Collective Rights and Minority Rights.Seumas Miller - 2000 - International Journal of Applied Philosophy 14 (2):241-257.
Human rights and human well-being.William Talbott - 2010 - New York: Oxford University Press.
Real Rights.Anthony Simon Laden - 1997 - Philosophical Review 106 (4):591.
Welfare rights and conflicts of rights.Katherine Eddy - 2006 - Res Publica 12 (4):337-356.
Living a directed life.William O'Chee - 2006 - Philosophical Practice 2 (3):153-165.
The nature and basis of inalienable rights.Terrance McConnell - 1984 - Law and Philosophy 3 (1):25 - 59.

Analytics

Added to PP
2022-11-29

Downloads
608 (#29,363)

6 months
203 (#13,717)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Benjamin Kiesewetter
Bielefeld University

Citations of this work

Add more citations

References found in this work

Anarchy, State, and Utopia.Robert Nozick - 1974 - New York: Basic Books.
Slaves of the passions.Mark Andrew Schroeder - 2007 - New York: Oxford University Press.
Ethics without principles.Jonathan Dancy - 2004 - New York: Oxford University Press.
Practical reason and norms.Joseph Raz - 1975 - London: Hutchinson.

View all 38 references / Add more references