The extension of Peer review, how should it or should not be done?

Social Epistemology 17 (1):65 – 77 (2003)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

This Article does not have an abstract

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 91,202

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Analytics

Added to PP
2009-01-28

Downloads
12 (#1,020,711)

6 months
1 (#1,444,594)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Citations of this work

“Peer Review is Melting Our Glaciers”: What Led the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change to Go Astray?Laszlo Kosolosky - 2015 - Journal for General Philosophy of Science / Zeitschrift für Allgemeine Wissenschaftstheorie 46 (2):351-366.

Add more citations