Authors
Anton Killin
Australian National University
Abstract
Aestheticians should be excited by the prospects of a philosophy of antiques. It is to their merit that Curtis and Baines (2016) ignite philosophical discussion about this aesthetically and historically important category, so far overlooked by philosophers. And I agree with much they have to say on the topic. For one, I think the Adjectival Thesis they proffer is sound. That is, the term ‘antique’ does not denote a kind of object (it is not a kind sortal); rather, it modifies objects—we can think of those modified objects as having “antique status.” But I do have several points of contention concerning their analysis. I hope these reservations will contribute to the project-in- progress that Curtis and Baines see their article as having sketched out.
Keywords Antiques
Categories (categorize this paper)
DOI 10.1111/jaac.12362
Options
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Request removal from index
Revision history

Download options

PhilArchive copy


Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy     Papers currently archived: 58,408
Through your library

References found in this work BETA

What Is an Antique?Benjamin L. Curtis & Darrin Baines - 2016 - Journal of Aesthetics and Art Criticism 74 (1):75-86.
The Aesthetic of the Antique.Leon Rosenstein - 1987 - Journal of Aesthetics and Art Criticism 45 (4):393-402.

Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

Fictionalism About Musical Works.Anton Killin - 2018 - Canadian Journal of Philosophy 48 (2):266-291.
Must Antiques Be Technically Excellent? A Rejoinder to Killin.Darrin Baines & Benjamin L. Curtis - 2019 - Journal of Aesthetics and Art Criticism 77 (1):83-85.

Add more citations

Similar books and articles

Liberal Presumptions: A Response to Curtis.Ranjoo Seodu Herr - 2007 - Political Theory 35 (3):341-47.
Analyzing "Ratio" and "Difference" Judgments: A Reply to Rule and Curtis.Clairice T. Veit - 1980 - Journal of Experimental Psychology: General 109 (3):301-303.
Propositional Content.Stephen R. Schiffer - 2006 - In Ernest Lepore & Barry C. Smith (eds.), The Oxford Handbook of Philosophy of Language. Oxford University Press.
Members Only?William M. Curtis - 2007 - Political Theory 35 (3):334-340.

Analytics

Added to PP index
2017-04-27

Total views
22 ( #476,146 of 2,420,735 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
3 ( #249,026 of 2,420,735 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads

My notes