Abstract
In the last lecture I talked first about the difference principle, and then about the original position and the intuitions that seem to have guided Rawls in constructing it. At the end I was saying that his intuitions about religion and morality are those of the small-l liberal, who wants a 'fair go' for diverse and conflicting philosophies of life. This leads to my next topic (still under the general heading of the Original Position), -
Keywords No keywords specified (fix it)
Categories (categorize this paper)
Options
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Request removal from index
Revision history

Download options

PhilArchive copy


Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy     Papers currently archived: 72,564
External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
Through your library

References found in this work BETA

No references found.

Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

No citations found.

Add more citations

Similar books and articles

Equal Minds Behind the Veil of Ignorance.Speranta Dumitru - 2007 - The Proceedings of the Twenty-First World Congress of Philosophy 1:127-135.
Human Embryos in the Original Position?Russell Disilvestro - 2005 - Journal of Medicine and Philosophy 30 (3):285 – 304.
A Defense of the Maximin Principle in Rawls' Theory of Justice.Robert C. Robinson - 2009 - Humanity and Social Science Journal 4 (2):175-179.
May Western Rights, by Extension, Become Human Rights?Antonio Pérez-Estévez - 2007 - The Proceedings of the Twenty-First World Congress of Philosophy 3:61-72.

Analytics

Added to PP index
2009-01-28

Total views
76 ( #155,224 of 2,533,484 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
2 ( #261,612 of 2,533,484 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads

My notes