Why is relativity interesting? [Book Review]
British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 42 (3):413-423 (1991)
| Authors | |
| Abstract | This article has no associated abstract. (fix it) |
| Keywords | No keywords specified (fix it) |
| Categories | (categorize this paper) |
| DOI | 10.1093/bjps/42.3.413 |
| Options |
Mark as duplicate
Export citation
Request removal from index
|
Download options
References found in this work BETA
The Comparative Reception of Relativity.Thomas F. Glick & Boston Colloquium for the Philosophy of Science - 1987
Citations of this work BETA
No citations found.
Similar books and articles
Intimations of Relativity Relativity Before Einstein.G. H. Keswani & C. W. Kilmister - 1983 - British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 34 (4):343-354.
Relativity, Time and Reality: A Critical Investigation of the Einstein Theory of Relativity From a Logical Point of View.Harald Nordenson - 1969 - London: Allen & Unwin.
A Modest Remark About Reichenbach, Rotation, and General Relativity.David Malament - 1985 - Philosophy of Science 52 (4):615-620.
The Origin of the Phenomenon of Relativity and the Theory of Atomic Relativity.Thomas Marshall - 1937 - [Chicago.
Review: Why Is Relativity Interesting? [REVIEW]C. W. Kilmister - 1991 - British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 42 (3):413 - 423.
Analytics
Added to PP index
2009-01-28
Total views
53 ( #191,022 of 2,420,551 )
Recent downloads (6 months)
3 ( #248,862 of 2,420,551 )
2009-01-28
Total views
53 ( #191,022 of 2,420,551 )
Recent downloads (6 months)
3 ( #248,862 of 2,420,551 )
How can I increase my downloads?
Downloads
