Authors
Samuel Kimpton-Nye
University of Bristol
Abstract
Hardcore actualism (HA) grounds all modal truths in the concrete constituents of the actual world (see, e.g., Borghini and Williams (2008), Jacobs (2010), Vetter (2015)). I bolster HA, and elucidate the very nature of possibility (and necessity) according to HA, by considering if it can validate S5 modal logic. Interestingly, different considerations pull in different directions on this issue. To resolve the tension, we are forced to think hard about the nature of the hardcore actualist’s modal reality and how radically this departs from possible worlds orthodoxy. Once we achieve this departure, the prospects of a hardcore actualist validation of S5 look considerably brighter. This paper thus strengthens hardcore actualism by arguing that it can indeed validate S5–arguably the most popular logic of metaphysical modality–and, in the process, it elucidates the very nature of modality according to this revisionary, but very attractive, modal metaphysics.
Keywords actualism  hardcore actualism  logic  modality  possible worlds  potentiality  S5
Categories (categorize this paper)
DOI 10.1111/phpr.12656
Options
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Request removal from index
Revision history

Download options

PhilArchive copy


Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy     Papers currently archived: 51,508
Through your library

References found in this work BETA

Every Thing Must Go: Metaphysics Naturalized.James Ladyman & Don Ross - 2007 - In James Ladyman, Don Ross, David Spurrett & John Collier (eds.), Every Thing Must Go: Metaphysics Naturalized. Oxford University Press.
On the Plurality of Worlds.Allen Stairs - 1988 - Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 49 (2):333-352.
Finkish Dispositions.David K. Lewis - 1997 - Philosophical Quarterly 47 (187):143-158.
Counterfactuals.David Lewis - 1975 - Philosophy of Science 42 (3):341-344.

View all 24 references / Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

The Gap Problem Made Easy?Tien-Chun Lo - forthcoming - Analysis:anz092.

Add more citations

Similar books and articles

Hardcore Actualism and Possible Non‐Existence.Samuel Kimpton‐Nye - 2018 - Thought: A Journal of Philosophy 7 (2):122-131.
Actualism and Modal Semantics.José Zalabardo - 2018 - Acta Analytica 33 (1):35-49.
S5 for Aristotelian Actualists.Benjamin Mitchell-Yellin & Michael Nelson - 2016 - Philosophical Studies 173 (6):1537-1569.
Actualism and Higher-Order Worlds.Reina Hayaki - 2003 - Philosophical Studies 115 (2):149 - 178.
Worlds and Times.Ulrich Meyer - 2006 - Notre Dame Journal of Formal Logic 47 (1):25--37.
Actualism and Quantified Modal Logic.Reina Hayaki - 2002 - Dissertation, Princeton University
Possible Worlds for Modal Primitivists.Louis deRosset - 2014 - Journal of Philosophical Logic 43 (1):109-131.
Modal Fragmentalism.Samuele Iaquinto - 2020 - The Philosophical Quarterly 70 (280):570-587.
Actualism Has Control Issues.Yishai Cohen & Travis Timmerman - 2016 - Journal of Ethics and Social Philosophy 10 (3):1-18.

Analytics

Added to PP index
2019-09-30

Total views
34 ( #283,024 of 2,330,909 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
12 ( #48,747 of 2,330,909 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads

My notes