Ethics and Behavior 11 (2):131 – 149 (2001)
In contrast to the behavioral sciences, the nature and impact of ethical procedures such as informed consent and constraints on the use of deception have been addressed infrequently in the marketing discipline. This article describes an initial investigation into the methodological and ethical practices reported in published marketing research articles since the mid-1970s. Empirical articles appearing in the Journal of Marketing Research and the Journal of Consumer Research between 1975 and 1976, 1989 and 1990, and 1996 and 1997 were coded according to methodological and ethical practices employed and compared with recent trends in the social psychological research literature. The marketing findings revealed an increase over time in laboratory experimentation, the utilization of active deception and debriefing, and the use of university student samples. Although the results suggest that marketing researchers use deception with less frequency and intensity overall than social psychologists, the observed rise in deception procedures in marketing investigations stands in stark contrast to the situation in social psychology, where deception rates have been declining along with a corresponding increase in nonexperimental methodologies and nonstudent samples. The article concludes with a call for greater attention to the ethical, methodological, and disciplinary consequences of the increasing use of deception in marketing research and emphasizes the need for more complete reporting of ethical procedures in published research.
|Keywords||No keywords specified (fix it)|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
References found in this work BETA
Attitudes of Marketing Professionals Toward Ethics in Marketing Research: A Cross-National Comparison. [REVIEW]Ishmael P. Akaah - 1990 - Journal of Business Ethics 9 (1):45 - 53.
[Book Review] Ethical Marketing Decisions, the Higher Road. [REVIEW]Eugene R. Laczniak & Patrick E. Murphy - 1995 - Business Ethics Quarterly 5:895-898.
Citations of this work BETA
The Relative Importance of Undesirable Truths.Lisa Bortolotti - 2013 - Medicine, Health Care and Philosophy 16 (4):683-690.
Similar books and articles
Epistemological Structures in Marketing.Donald P. Robin - 1991 - Business Ethics Quarterly 1 (2):185-200.
Deception Research Involving Children: Ethical Practices and Paradoxes.Celia B. Fisher - 2005 - Ethics and Behavior 15 (3):271 – 287.
Codes of Ethics Among Corporate Research Departments, Marketing Research Firms, and Data Subcontractors: An Examination of a Three-Communities Metaphor. [REVIEW]O. C. Ferrell, Michael D. Hartline & Stephen W. McDaniel - 1998 - Journal of Business Ethics 17 (5):49-62.
Ethical Decision Making and Research Deception in the Behavioral Sciences: An Application of Social Contract Theory.Allan J. Kimmel, N. Craig Smith & Jill Gabrielle Klein - 2011 - Ethics and Behavior 21 (3):222 - 251.
Marketing Research Ethics: Researcher's Obligations Toward Human Subjects.Sami Alsmadi - 2008 - Journal of Academic Ethics 6 (2):153-160.
A Comparative Analysis of Ethical Perceptions in Marketing Research: U.S.A. Vs. Canada. [REVIEW]Ralph W. Giacobbe & Madhav N. Segal - 2000 - Journal of Business Ethics 27 (3):229 - 245.
Managerial and Public Attitudes Toward Ethics in Marketing Research.Praveen Aggarwal, Rajiv Vaidyanathan & Stephen Castleberry - 2012 - Journal of Business Ethics 109 (4):463-481.
An Integrated Model for Ethical Decisions in Marketing Research.Naresh K. Malhotra & Gina L. Miller - 1998 - Journal of Business Ethics 17 (3):263-280.
Added to index2009-01-28
Total downloads29 ( #177,649 of 2,171,976 )
Recent downloads (6 months)1 ( #326,556 of 2,171,976 )
How can I increase my downloads?