Governance of Nanotechnology and Nanomaterials: Principles, Regulation, and Renegotiating the Social Contract
Journal of Law, Medicine & Ethics 37 (4):706-723 (2009)
Good governance for nanotechnology and nanomaterials is predicated on principles of general good governance. This paper discusses on what lessons we can learn from the oversight of past emerging technologies in formulating these principles. Nanotechnology provides us a valuable opportunity to apply these lessons and a duty to avoid repeating past mistakes. To do that will require mandatory regulation, grounded in precaution, that takes into account the uniqueness of nanomaterials. Moreover, this policy dialogue is not taking place in a vacuum. In applying the lessons of the past, nanotechnology provides a window to renegotiate our public's social contract on chemicals, health, the environment, and risks. Emerging technologies illuminate structural weaknesses, providing a crucial chance to ameliorate lingering regulatory inadequacies and provide much needed updates of existing laws
|Keywords||No keywords specified (fix it)|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
References found in this work BETA
No references found.
Citations of this work BETA
No citations found.
Similar books and articles
Transnational Governance Arrangements: Legitimate Alternatives to Regulating Nanotechnologies? [REVIEW]Evisa Kica & Diana M. Bowman - 2013 - NanoEthics 7 (1):69-82.
Renegotiating the Social Contract: Hobbes to Rawls.Deborah A. Kissinger - 2003 - Dissertation, University of Hawai'i
Nanotechnology Bound: Evaluating the Case for More Regulation. [REVIEW]Patrick Lin - 2007 - NanoEthics 1 (2):105-122.
The Three Pillars of Corporate Social Reporting as New Governance Regulation.David Hess - 2008 - Business Ethics Quarterly 18 (4):447-482.
Governing Nanotechnology in a Multi-Stakeholder World.Ineke Malsch - 2013 - NanoEthics 7 (2):161-172.
Filling the Information Void: Using Public Registries as a Tool in Nanotechnologies Regulation. [REVIEW]Diana M. Bowman & Karinne Ludlow - 2009 - Journal of Bioethical Inquiry 6 (1):25-36.
Perception of Risk and Nanotechnology.E. Schuller - 2004 - In Baird D. (ed.), Discovering the Nanoscale. Ios.
The Social Contract: Or, Principles of Political Right.Jean-Jacques Rousseau - 1974 - New American Library.
Nanotechnology, Governance, and Public Deliberation: What Role for the Social Sciences?Phil Macnaghten, , Matthew B. Kearnes & Brian Wynne - unknown
Integrating and Enacting 'Social and Ethical Issues' in Nanotechnology Practices.Ana Viseu & Heather Maguire - 2012 - NanoEthics 6 (3):195-209.
Renegotiating the Contract.Pleshette DeArmitt - 2004 - Southern Journal of Philosophy 42 (S1):116-121.
Standardisation in the Field of Nanotechnology: Some Issues of Legitimacy.Ellen-Marie Forsberg - 2012 - Science and Engineering Ethics 18 (4):719-739.
Social Reporting and New Governance Regulation.David Hess - 2007 - Business Ethics Quarterly 17 (3):453-476.
The Social Impacts of Nanotechnology: An Ethical and Political Analysis. [REVIEW]Robert Sparrow - 2009 - Journal of Bioethical Inquiry 6 (1):13-23.
Contracting Justice.John T. Sanders - 2007 - In Malcolm Murray (ed.), Liberty, Games, and Contracts: Jan Narveson and the Defence of Libertarianism. Ashgate.
Added to index2010-09-13
Total downloads12 ( #374,423 of 2,163,617 )
Recent downloads (6 months)1 ( #348,037 of 2,163,617 )
How can I increase my downloads?