Locke and the mind-body problem: An interpretation of his agnosticism

Philosophy 83 (4):439-458 (2008)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

From the Lockean point of view, the mind-body problem is conceived as a problem created by us. It is an error to think there is a problem with mind and body, an error of confusing nominality with reality. I argue that Locke’s agnosticism should be understood as a warning not to confuse our human point of view with what really is. From this perspective, the mind-body problem is a nominal problem, not a real one. It appears to us as a problem, but is not really so. But what makes it appear to us as a problem? This is Locke’s starting point for solving the mind-body problem.

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 74,649

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Crane on the Mind-Body Problem and Emergence.Olga Markić - 2004 - Croatian Journal of Philosophy 4 (2):199-205.
What Kind of Philosopher Was Locke on Mind and Body?Han-Kyul Kim - 2010 - Pacific Philosophical Quarterly 91 (2):180-207.
Color and the Mind‐Body Problem.Alex Byrne - 2006 - Dialectica 60 (2):223-44.
Can We Solve the Mind-Body Problem?Colin McGinn - 1989 - Mind 98 (July):349-66.
Mind-Body, Body-Mind: Two Distinct Problems.Benny Shanon - 2008 - Philosophical Psychology 21 (5):697 – 701.

Analytics

Added to PP
2009-01-28

Downloads
198 (#62,893)

6 months
4 (#172,750)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Han-Kyul Kim
Temple University

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references