Locke and the mind-body problem: An interpretation of his agnosticism

Philosophy 83 (4):439-458 (2008)
Authors
Han-Kyul Kim
Temple University
Abstract
From the Lockean point of view, the mind-body problem is conceived as a problem created by us. It is an error to think there is a problem with mind and body, an error of confusing nominality with reality. I argue that Locke’s agnosticism should be understood as a warning not to confuse our human point of view with what really is. From this perspective, the mind-body problem is a nominal problem, not a real one. It appears to us as a problem, but is not really so. But what makes it appear to us as a problem? This is Locke’s starting point for solving the mind-body problem.
Keywords agnosticism
Categories (categorize this paper)
DOI 10.1017/S003181910800082X
Options
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Request removal from index
Revision history

Download options

Our Archive


Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy     Papers currently archived: 33,208
Through your library

References found in this work BETA

No references found.

Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

Add more citations

Similar books and articles

Crane on the Mind-Body Problem and Emergence.Olga Markić - 2004 - Croatian Journal of Philosophy 4 (2):199-205.
What Kind of Philosopher Was Locke on Mind and Body?Han-Kyul Kim - 2010 - Pacific Philosophical Quarterly 91 (2):180-207.
Color and the Mind-Body Problem.Alex Byrne - 2006 - Dialectica 60 (2):223-44.
Can We Solve the Mind-Body Problem?Colin McGinn - 1989 - Mind 98 (July):349-66.
Mind-Body, Body-Mind: Two Distinct Problems.Benny Shanon - 2008 - Philosophical Psychology 21 (5):697 – 701.

Analytics

Added to PP index
2009-01-28

Total downloads
138 ( #40,916 of 2,242,594 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
9 ( #43,531 of 2,242,594 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Monthly downloads

My notes

Sign in to use this feature