Making Policy with Bureaucrats and Experts: The Dilemma of Citizen Members in the Participatory Pension Reforms in Japan


Abstract
Documenting how the Japanese state responded to increasing social discontent during initiation of unpopular welfare reforms, this study examines the factors that hindered the political empowerment of civil society despite the timely introduction of participatory policymaking institutions. The Japanese government opted in the early 2000s to introduce a participatory method to initiate the unpopular pension reform. Deliberation councils were established to encourage open discussions among government policymakers and committee members, including citizen representatives. The final outcomes of the deliberations, however, were mostly about parametric adjustments and did not adequately consider the urgent demand of the general public. The participatory measure did not significantly improve the public's trust in the pension programs, but it did justify the government's reform initiatives. The welfare bureaucracy that set the goal, defined the scope of the agenda, and steered the discussions toward technical issues structurally restricted the voices of the citizen members in the deliberation councils. The lack of citizen advocacy groups, which could otherwise have effectively supported the citizen members on the committee, contributed to the limited roles and influences of the citizens. It is argued that the traditional conservative corporatism of Japan was reinforced during this time period, despite the introduction of the idea of participatory governance.
Keywords No keywords specified (fix it)
Categories (categorize this paper)
DOI 10.1017/s1468109916000074
Options
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Request removal from index
Revision history

Download options

Our Archive


Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy     Papers currently archived: 45,283
External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
Through your library

References found in this work BETA

No references found.

Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

No citations found.

Add more citations

Similar books and articles

Pension System in Japan: Issues for Reform.Audrius Bitinas - 2012 - Jurisprudencija: Mokslo darbu žurnalas 19 (1):269-292.
The Hanford Advisory Board: Participatory Democracy, Technology, and Representation.Alex Sager & Alex Zakaras - 2014 - Journal of Environmental Studies and Sciences 4 (2):142-155.
Modern Pension System Reforms in Lithuania: Impact of Crisis and Ageing.Audrius Bitinas - 2011 - Jurisprudencija: Mokslo darbu žurnalas 18 (3):1055-1080.
How Participatory Budgeting Changes the Meaning and Practices of Citizenship.Marta Nunes da Costa - 2013 - Ethic@ - An International Journal for Moral Philosophy 12 (2):301-320.

Analytics

Added to PP index
2016-04-29

Total views
15 ( #577,011 of 2,279,964 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
1 ( #828,945 of 2,279,964 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads

My notes

Sign in to use this feature