Politics and Interest in Early Confucianism

Philosophy East and West 64 (2):425-448 (2014)

Abstract

Confucianism has long been considered an ethical system that consciously opposes material interest. Most tellingly, upon King Hui of Liang’s question of how to make his state profitable, the quintessential political question that no sensible political leader can afford to avoid, Mencius, one of the three giants of Confucianism (alongside Confucius and Xunzi), responded, “Why must you mention the word ‘profit’ (he bi yue li 何必曰利)? All that matters is that there should be benevolence (ren 仁) and rightness (yi 義).”1As Mencian Confucianism became dominant in mainstream Chinese politics in the eleventh century, later Confucians, especially Cheng-Zhu Neo-Confucians, who were strongly influenced by Mencius, never ..

Download options

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 72,856

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Analytics

Added to PP
2014-04-15

Downloads
26 (#444,425)

6 months
1 (#386,040)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Sungmoon Kim
City University of Hong Kong

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

Similar books and articles

The Humanist Way in Ancient China.Chʻu Chai - 1965 - New York: Bantam Books.
Political Thought in Early Confucianism.Liang Tao - 2010 - Frontiers of Philosophy in China 5 (2):212-236.
Mencius and the Natural Environment.Cecilia Wee - 2009 - Environmental Ethics 31 (4):359-374.
A Mencian Version of Limited Democracy.Tongdong Bai - 2008 - Res Publica 14 (1):19-34.
Way of Post-Confucianism: Transformation and Genealogy. [REVIEW]Zhuoyue Huang - 2010 - Frontiers of Philosophy in China 5 (4):543-559.