Synthese 122 (3):245-259 (2000)
It is often argued that if a mentalproperty supervenes on a physical property, then (1)the mental property M ``inherits'''' its causal efficacyfrom the physical property P and (2) the causalefficacy of M reduces to that of P. However, once weunderstand the supervenience thesis and the concept ofcausation probabilistically, it turns out that we caninfer the causal efficacy of M from that of P andvice versa if and only if a certain condition, whichI call the ``line-up'''' thesis, holds. I argue that thesupervenience thesis entails neither this conditionnor its denial. I also argue that even when theline-up thesis holds true, reductionism about thecausal efficacy of the mental property doesn''tfollow
|Keywords||Causation Metaphysics Mind Probability Supervenience|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
References found in this work BETA
No references found.
Citations of this work BETA
No citations found.
Similar books and articles
The Supervenience Argument Generalizes.Thomas D. Bontly - 2002 - Philosophical Studies 109 (1):75-96.
Supervenience and Object-Dependent Properties.Thomas Hofweber - 2005 - Journal of Philosophy 102 (1):5-32.
Supervenience and Supervenient Causation.Jaegwon Kim - 1984 - Southern Journal of Philosophy Supplement 22 (S1):45-56.
From Supervenience to Superdupervenience: Meeting the Demands of a Material World.Terence E. Horgan - 1993 - Mind 102 (408):555-86.
Good Old Supervenience: Mental Causation on the Cheap.Nick Zangwill - 1996 - Synthese 106 (1):67-101.
In Defense of Global Supervenience.R. Cranston Paull & Theodore Sider - 1992 - Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 52 (4):833-53.
Mental Causation and the Supervenience Argument.Jürgen Schröder - 2007 - Erkenntnis 67 (2):221 - 237.
A No Causal Rivalry Solution to the Problem of Mental Causation.Anthony B. Dardis - 2002 - Acta Analytica 17 (28):69-77.
Added to index2009-01-28
Total downloads60 ( #87,837 of 2,172,660 )
Recent downloads (6 months)1 ( #325,028 of 2,172,660 )
How can I increase my downloads?