Technological Unemployment, Meaning in Life, Purpose of Business, and the Future of Stakeholders

Journal of Business Ethics 160 (2):319-337 (2019)

Authors
Tae Kim
University of Pennsylvania
Abstract
We offer a precautionary account of why business managers should proactively rethink about what kinds of automation firms ought to implement, by exploring two challenges that automation will potentially pose. We engage the current debate concerning whether life without work opportunities will incur a meaning crisis, offering an argument in favor of the position that if technological unemployment occurs, the machine age may be a structurally limited condition for many without work opportunities to have or add meaning to their lives. We term this the axiological challenge. This challenge, if it turns out to be persuasive, leads to a second challenge, to which managers should pay special attention: the teleological challenge, a topic especially relevant to the broad literature about corporate purpose and governance. We argue that both the shareholder profit-maximization model and its major alternative, stakeholder theory, are insufficient to address the meaning crisis. Unless rebutted, the two challenges compel business leaders to proactively rethink the purpose of business for future society. Otherwise, businesses will be contributors to a major ethical crisis and societal externality in the coming society.
Keywords No keywords specified (fix it)
Categories (categorize this paper)
ISBN(s)
DOI 10.1007/s10551-019-04205-9
Options
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Request removal from index
Revision history

Download options

Our Archive


Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy     Papers currently archived: 46,509
External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
Through your library

References found in this work BETA

What We Owe to Each Other.Thomas Scanlon - 1998 - Belknap Press of Harvard University Press.
Contingency, Irony, and Solidarity.Richard Rorty - 1989 - The Personalist Forum 5 (2):149-152.

View all 41 references / Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

A Normative Meaning of Meaningful Work.Christopher Michaelson - forthcoming - Journal of Business Ethics:1-16.

Add more citations

Similar books and articles

In Defense of the Post-Work Future: Withdrawal and the Ludic Life.John Danaher - forthcoming - In Michael Cholbi & Michael Weber (eds.), The Future of Work, Technology, and Basic Income. New York: Routledge. pp. 99-116.
Twin Towers: A Philosophy and Theology of Business. [REVIEW]William J. Byron - 1988 - Journal of Business Ethics 7 (7):525 - 530.
Defending the Purpose Theory of Meaning in Life.Jason Poettcker - 2015 - Journal of Philosophy of Life 5 (3):180-207.
Poor People and the Politics of Capitalism.R. Edward Freeman, Adrian Keevil & Lauren Purnell - 2011 - Business and Professional Ethics Journal 30 (3-4):179-194.
The Benefit Corporation and Corporate Social Responsibility.Janine S. Hiller - 2013 - Journal of Business Ethics 118 (2):287-301.

Analytics

Added to PP index
2019-06-06

Total views
17 ( #537,578 of 2,286,511 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
8 ( #128,440 of 2,286,511 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads

My notes

Sign in to use this feature