Where is your pain? A Cross-cultural Comparison of the Concept of Pain in Americans and South Korea


Authors
Hyo-eun Kim
Ewha Women's University
Justin Sytsma
Victoria University of Wellington
Kevin Reuter
Ruhr-Universität Bochum
Abstract
Philosophical orthodoxy holds that pains are mental states, taking this to reflect the ordinary conception of pain. Despite this, evidence is mounting that English speakers do not tend to conceptualize pains in this way; rather, they tend to treat pains as being bodily states. We hypothesize that this is driven by two primary factors—the phenomenology of feeling pains and the surface grammar of pain reports. There is reason to expect that neither of these factors is culturally specific, however, and thus reason to expect that the empirical findings for English speakers will generalize to other cultures and other languages. In this article we begin to test this hypothesis, reporting the results of two cross-cultural studies comparing judgments about the location of referred pains between two groups—Americans and South Koreans—that we might otherwise expect to differ in how they understand pains. In line with our predictions, we find that both groups tend to conceive of pains as bodily states.
Keywords pain, concept of pain, semantics of pain, experimental philosophy, cross-cultural study, sound
Categories (categorize this paper)
Reprint years 2016
DOI 10.12697/spe.2016.9.1.06
Options
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Request removal from index
Revision history

Download options

Our Archive


Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy     Papers currently archived: 41,608
External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
Through your library

References found in this work BETA

Naming and Necessity.Saul Kripke - 1981 - Philosophy 56 (217):431-433.
What Makes Pains Unpleasant?David Bain - 2013 - Philosophical Studies 166 (1):69-89.
Intuitions About Consciousness: Experimental Studies.Joshua Knobe & Jesse Prinz - 2008 - Phenomenology and the Cognitive Sciences 7 (1):67-83.

View all 32 references / Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

Experimental Philosophy of Pain.Justin Sytsma & Kevin Reuter - 2017 - Journal of Indian Council of Philosophical Research 34 (3):611-628.
Unfelt Pain.Kevin Reuter & Justin Sytsma - forthcoming - Synthese.

View all 6 citations / Add more citations

Similar books and articles

When Pains Are Mental Objects.Abraham Olivier - 2003 - Philosophical Studies 115 (1):33-53.
Pain and Value.Adam Swenson - 2006 - Dissertation, Rutgers University, New Brunswick
Pains and Sounds.Ivan V. Ivanov - 2011 - Journal of Consciousness Studies 18 (9-10):143-163.
Imperatives, Phantom Pains, and Hallucination by Presupposition.Colin Klein - 2012 - Philosophical Psychology 25 (6):917-928.
The Location of Pains.David Bain - 2007 - Philosophical Papers 36 (2):171-205.
More in Pain.Paul Noordhof - 2002 - Analysis 62 (2):153-154.
Response to Tumulty on Pain and Imperatives.Colin Klein - 2010 - Journal of Philosophy 107 (10):554-557.
Reconsidering Pain.Norton Nelkin - 1994 - Philosophical Psychology 7 (3):325-43.
Pain's Evils.Adam Swenson - 2009 - Utilitas 21 (2):197-216.
What Makes Pains Unpleasant?David Bain - 2013 - Philosophical Studies 166 (1):69-89.
Mad Pain and Martian Pain.David K. Lewis - 1980 - In Ned Block (ed.), Readings in the Philosophy of Psychology. Harvard University Press. pp. 216-222.
Pains, Brains, and Opium.Anthony H. Dickenson - 1997 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 20 (3):479-482.
Pains as Reasons.Manolo Martínez - 2015 - Philosophical Studies 172 (9):2261-2274.

Analytics

Added to PP index
2016-03-14

Total views
54 ( #146,080 of 2,249,273 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
7 ( #246,625 of 2,249,273 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads

My notes

Sign in to use this feature