A League of Their Own? Evaluating Justifications for The Division of Sport into 'Enhanced' and 'Unenhanced' Leagues

Sport, Ethics and Philosophy 6 (1):31-45 (2012)

Authors
Michele King
University of Southern California
Abstract
Cheating through the use of illegal performance enhancements (such as doping) is a persistent problem in sport. It has been suggested that one response to this problem is to separate sport into two parallel leagues. One league would resemble sport as it is currently practised ? i.e. with restrictions on use of particular enhancements ? and the other would not possess these restrictions, allowing those that wish to use currently illegal enhancements to do so. In this paper I articulate the ?two leagues? proposal further and subject it to critical scrutiny. The proposal fails. It does so by failing to address conceptual confusion regarding enhancement use in sport; by replicating in the new league the current problems associated with enhancement-based cheating; and by creating new problems. In an attempt to revive it I describe other possible justifications for the proposal, based on its promotion of personal autonomy, and rights-based justifications. These fail, with the exception of a group right claiming provision of the enhanced league as a participatory good. I conclude that this latter use of the proposal is the only sensible one, but it nevertheless faces significant obstacles
Keywords No keywords specified (fix it)
Categories (categorize this paper)
DOI 10.1080/17511321.2011.587198
Options
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Request removal from index
Revision history

Download options

Our Archive


Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy     Papers currently archived: 46,425
External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
Through your library

References found in this work BETA

The Morality of Freedom.Joseph Raz - 1986 - Oxford University Press.
The Case Against Perfection.Michael J. Sandel - 2004 - The Atlantic (April):1–11.
Justice, Fairness, and Enhancement.Julian Savulescu - 2006 - Annals of New York Academy of Science 1093:321-338.
On the Argument That Enhancement is "Cheating".M. Schermer - 2008 - Journal of Medical Ethics 34 (2):85-88.

View all 7 references / Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

Doping: Just Do It?J. Angelo Corlett - 2013 - Sport, Ethics and Philosophy 7 (4):430-449.
Ethical, Legal and Social Concerns Relating to Exoskeletons.Dov Greenbaum - 2015 - Acm Sigcas Computers and Society 45 (3):234-239.

Add more citations

Similar books and articles

Gender Roles Roll.Pam R. Sailors - 2013 - Sport, Ethics and Philosophy 7 (2):245-258.
Respecting Privacy in Detecting Illegitimate Enhancements in Athletes.Sarah Teetzel - 2007 - Sport, Ethics and Philosophy 1 (2):159 – 170.
Genetics, Bioethics and Sport.Andy Miah - 2007 - Sport, Ethics and Philosophy 1 (2):146 – 158.
A Hermeneutics of Sport.Andrew Edgar - 2013 - Sport, Ethics and Philosophy 7 (1):140 - 167.
The Beauty of Sport.Andrew Edgar - 2013 - Sport, Ethics and Philosophy 7 (1):100 - 120.
Phenomenology and Sports Psychology: Back To The Things Themselves!Mark Nesti - 2011 - Sport, Ethics and Philosophy 5 (3):285 - 296.

Analytics

Added to PP index
2012-02-29

Total views
14 ( #622,813 of 2,286,379 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
1 ( #853,841 of 2,286,379 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads

My notes

Sign in to use this feature