Angelic Sin in Augustine and Anselm

Abstract
Augustine and Anselm form a common tradition in mediæval thought about angelic sin, a tradition rooted in patristic thought and centred on their attempts to give a philosophically coherent account of moral choice. Augustine concentrates on the reasons and causes of angelic sin, especially in reference to free will; Anselm adopts Augustine’s analysis and extends it to issues about the rationality of sinful choice. Each takes Lucifer’s primal sin to be the paradigm case. Lucifer, undistracted by bodily desires and unencumbered by history, committed the first moral misdeed in an entirely good universe newly created by an entirely good God. The challenge is to give a philosophical account that permits us to understand how the best and brightest of all angels nevertheless made a sinful choice in such uniformly positive circumstances.
Keywords No keywords specified (fix it)
Categories (categorize this paper)
Options
 Save to my reading list
Follow the author(s)
Edit this record
My bibliography
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Mark as duplicate
Request removal from index
Translate to english
Revision history
Download options
Our Archive


Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy     Papers currently archived: 30,224
External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
Through your library
References found in this work BETA

No references found.

Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

No citations found.

Add more citations

Similar books and articles
Kant on the Debt of Sin.Lawrence Pasternack - 2012 - Faith and Philosophy 29 (1):30-52.
Aquinas and Intellectual Determinism: The Test Case of Angelic Sin.Tobias Hoffmann - 2007 - Archiv für Geschichte der Philosophie 89 (2):122-156.
God is Not the Author of Sin.Katherin A. Rogers - 2007 - Faith and Philosophy 24 (3):300-310.
Augustine on Sin and Moral Agency.William S. Babcock - 1988 - Journal of Religious Ethics 16 (1):28-55.
God, Sin, and Rogers on Anselm.Hugh J. McCann - 2009 - Faith and Philosophy 26 (4):420-431.
Anselm's Definition of Free Will.Stan R. Tyvoll - 2006 - American Catholic Philosophical Quarterly 80 (2):155-171.
Original Sin or Original Sinfulness? A Comment.Simon Heans - 2013 - Heythrop Journal 54 (1):55-69.
Added to PP index
2009-12-17

Total downloads
54 ( #99,745 of 2,192,051 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
3 ( #95,633 of 2,192,051 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Monthly downloads
My notes
Sign in to use this feature