Authors
Abstract
Power consists in the capacity of A to command B, even against B's wishes, whether directly or indirectly. Questions to do with who possesses it and in what degree are obscured by inflationary shifts of definition (as where power encompasses action as such, or right action, or co?operation). These misjudged moves are generally marked by the assumption that democracy displaces power. But if democracy ultimately persists as a voting procedure, its object is to create power?holders. Democracy may endorse three electoral principles: (a) majority rule, or (b) enhanced majority rule, or (c) unanimity. Its commonest electoral device is (a), but its strongest moral defence for (a) implicitly is (c), which legitimates forms of (d) veto and forms of minority rule. If (d) is fair, this need not follow from (a). Nor is (a) right in virtue of superior power. Democracy is commonly a combination of (a) plus (e) defence of individual and corporate rights. But this combination, while apt and convenient, is not incontestably coherent. Despite growing support for deliberation over election, if democracy must be impelled by (a), thus far does it sustain, not topple, power. If power persists more stably under democracies than elsewhere, sustained caution in regard to its supposed ?circularization? is fully warranted.
Keywords No keywords specified (fix it)
Categories (categorize this paper)
DOI 10.1080/13698239808403260
Options
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Request removal from index
Revision history

Download options

Our Archive


Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy     Papers currently archived: 50,241
External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
Through your library

References found in this work BETA

Toward a Theory of Social Power.Alvin I. Goldman - 1972 - Philosophical Studies 23 (4):221 - 268.
Authority.E. D. Watt - 1982 - St. Martin's Press.

View all 6 references / Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

No citations found.

Add more citations

Similar books and articles

Who Counts? On Democracy, Power, and the Incalculable.Dennis Schmidt - 2008 - Research in Phenomenology 38 (2):228-243.
Capitalists Rule Ok? Some Puzzles About Power.Brian Barry - 2002 - Politics, Philosophy and Economics 1 (2):155-184.
The Concept of Democracy.Shuifa Han - 2008 - Frontiers of Philosophy in China 3 (4):622-632.
Overwhelming Power: Part One ‐ Inflationary Tactics.Preston King - 1998 - Critical Review of International Social and Political Philosophy 1 (1):1-27.
Consensus and Power in Deliberative Democracy.Tim6 Heysse - 2006 - Inquiry: An Interdisciplinary Journal of Philosophy 49 (3):265 – 289.
The Concept of Democracy.Han Shuifa & Hu Jinglei - 2008 - Frontiers of Philosophy in China 3 (4):622 - 632.
Majority Rule and Minority Rights.Jitendra Nath Sarker - 2006 - The Proceedings of the Twenty-First World Congress of Philosophy 2:169-173.
Democracy and Private Discretion in Business.Wim Dubbink - 2005 - Business Ethics Quarterly 15 (1):37-66.
Capitalists Rule. Ok? A Commentary on Keith Dowding.Brian Barry - 2003 - Politics, Philosophy and Economics 2 (3):323-341.
Power and Freedom in Modern Politics.Jeremy Moon & Bruce Stone (eds.) - 2002 - University of Western Australia Press.

Analytics

Added to PP index
2011-10-19

Total views
7 ( #960,680 of 2,325,132 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
2 ( #455,085 of 2,325,132 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads

My notes