Designating propositions

Philosophical Review 111 (3):341-371 (2002)
  Copy   BIBTEX


Like many, though of course not all, philosophers, I believe in propositions. I take propositions to be structured, sentence-like entities whose structures are identical to the syntactic structures of the sentences that express them; and I have defended a particular version of such a view of propositions elsewhere. In the present work, I shall assume that the structures of propositions are at least very similar to the structures of the sentences that express them. Further, I shall assume that ordinary names are devices of direct reference and contribute only their bearers to propositions, that n-place predicates contribute n-place properties or relations to propositions, and that verbs of propositional attitude contribute to propositions two-place relations between individuals and propositions. The broad outline of a framework that includes these assumptions is one that I think many, though again not all, philosophers of language find congenial. I am concerned here to investigate and explain, from the standpoint of this framework, a puzzling phenomenon. The explanation I give of the phenomenon could be adapted to fit with frameworks somewhat different from the one adopted here. I adopt the present framework in part simply for definiteness.



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 79,971

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

On fineness of grain.Jeffrey C. King - 2013 - Philosophical Studies 163 (3):763-781.
On cogito propositions.William J. Rapaport - 1976 - Philosophical Studies 29 (1):63-68.
The nature and structure of content.Jeffrey C. King - 2007 - New York: Oxford University Press.
Formalizing context (expanded notes).John McCarthy & Sasa Buvac - 1998 - CSLI Lecture Notes 81:13-50.
Structured propositions and sentence structure.Jeffrey King - 1996 - Journal of Philosophical Logic 25 (5):495 - 521.
Recent work on propositions.Peter Hanks - 2009 - Philosophy Compass 4 (3):469-486.
The Metalogic of Quantum Logic.Peter Mittelstaedt - 1978 - PSA: Proceedings of the Biennial Meeting of the Philosophy of Science Association 1978:249 - 256.


Added to PP

280 (#47,971)

6 months
14 (#88,813)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Jeffrey C. King
Rutgers University - New Brunswick

Citations of this work

Attitudes Towards Objects.Alex Grzankowski - 2016 - Noûs 50 (2):314-328.
Hopes, Fears, and Other Grammatical Scarecrows.Jacob M. Nebel - 2019 - Philosophical Review 128 (1):63-105.
That solution to Prior’s puzzle.Hüseyin Güngör - 2022 - Philosophical Studies 179 (9):2765-2785.
The Attitudes We Can Have.Daniel Drucker - 2020 - Philosophical Review 129 (4):591-642.

View all 48 citations / Add more citations

References found in this work

Do belief reports report beliefs?Kent Bach - 1997 - Pacific Philosophical Quarterly 78 (3):215-241.
Nominalizing quantifiers.Friederike Moltmann - 2003 - Journal of Philosophical Logic 32 (5):445-481.
Structured propositions and sentence structure.Jeffrey King - 1996 - Journal of Philosophical Logic 25 (5):495 - 521.

View all 13 references / Add more references