Philosophical Review 111 (3):341-371 (2002)

Authors
Jeffrey C. King
Rutgers University - New Brunswick
Abstract
Like many, though of course not all, philosophers, I believe in propositions. I take propositions to be structured, sentence-like entities whose structures are identical to the syntactic structures of the sentences that express them; and I have defended a particular version of such a view of propositions elsewhere. In the present work, I shall assume that the structures of propositions are at least very similar to the structures of the sentences that express them. Further, I shall assume that ordinary names are devices of direct reference and contribute only their bearers to propositions, that n-place predicates contribute n-place properties or relations to propositions, and that verbs of propositional attitude contribute to propositions two-place relations between individuals and propositions. The broad outline of a framework that includes these assumptions is one that I think many, though again not all, philosophers of language find congenial. I am concerned here to investigate and explain, from the standpoint of this framework, a puzzling phenomenon. The explanation I give of the phenomenon could be adapted to fit with frameworks somewhat different from the one adopted here. I adopt the present framework in part simply for definiteness.
Keywords Analytic Philosophy  Contemporary Philosophy  General Interest
Categories (categorize this paper)
ISBN(s) 0031-8108
DOI 10.1215/00318108-111-3-341
Options
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Request removal from index
Revision history

Download options

PhilArchive copy


Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy     Papers currently archived: 58,437
Through your library

References found in this work BETA

Do Belief Reports Report Beliefs?Kent Bach - 1997 - Pacific Philosophical Quarterly 78 (3):215-241.
Nominalizing Quantifiers.Friederike Moltmann - 2003 - Journal of Philosophical Logic 32 (5):445-481.
What is a Philosophical Analysis?Jeffrey C. King - 1998 - Philosophical Studies 90 (2):155-179.

View all 13 references / Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

Hopes, Fears, and Other Grammatical Scarecrows.Jacob M. Nebel - 2019 - Philosophical Review 128 (1):63-105.
Attitudes Towards Objects.Alex Grzankowski - 2016 - Noûs 50 (2):314-328.
The Attitudes We Can Have.Daniel Drucker - 2020 - Philosophical Review 129 (4):591-642.
Knowing‐Wh and Embedded Questions.Ted Parent - 2014 - Philosophy Compass 9 (2):81-95.
‘That’-Clauses and Non-Nominal Quantification.Tobias Rosefeldt - 2008 - Philosophical Studies 137 (3):301 - 333.

View all 45 citations / Add more citations

Similar books and articles

On Fineness of Grain.Jeffrey C. King - 2013 - Philosophical Studies 163 (3):763-781.
On Cogito Propositions.William J. Rapaport - 1976 - Philosophical Studies 29 (1):63-68.
The Nature and Structure of Content.Jeffrey C. King - 2007 - Oxford University Press.
Formalizing Context (Expanded Notes).John McCarthy & Sasa Buvac - 1998 - CSLI Lecture Notes 81:13-50.
Structured Propositions and Sentence Structure.Jeffrey King - 1996 - Journal of Philosophical Logic 25 (5):495 - 521.
Recent Work on Propositions.Peter Hanks - 2009 - Philosophy Compass 4 (3):469-486.
The Metalogic of Quantum Logic.Peter Mittelstaedt - 1978 - PSA: Proceedings of the Biennial Meeting of the Philosophy of Science Association 1978:249 - 256.

Analytics

Added to PP index
2009-01-28

Total views
240 ( #37,309 of 2,420,984 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
5 ( #152,508 of 2,420,984 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads

My notes